Go to page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |

Hello all,

I was reading the latest round of comments, both on the discussion board and in the list of notes to The Powers That Be, and something popped into my mind that I had to share with you.

Do you remember the movie "Pretty Woman"? Julia Roberts, Richard Gere, she's a hooker with a heart of gold, that one?

There's a scene where she walks into a high-priced store on Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills, looking a little ratty and wanting to buy herself better clothes so she can look the part of Richard Gere's "escort" for some business function or other. The store is empty, but all the sales ladies pretend to be terribly busy, terribly important, looking past her when she talks to them, until finally she leaves in tears.

Richard Gere's character finds out about this and takes her on this lovely whirlwind shopping tour, and we have the typical "plain girl transformed into princess" kinda scene that you get in some romantic movies.

During this shopping extravaganza, the now-stunning Julia Roberts makes it a point to go back to that same store, bags of merchandise on each arm, lovely hat, new dress, and oh, look! The sales ladies flock to her, all smiles and friendly, and "Can we help you?" and so on.

Julia's character positions herself in the center of all this attention, turns on her gazillion-watt smile, and says, "I was in here yesterday, actually. Remember, you wouldn't wait on me?" The sales ladies' smiles begin to falter. "You guys work on commission, right?" She looks around, and her expression changes to one of patience-with-idiots as she says, "BIG mistake", and turns, and walks out the door, tossing a jaunty "Bye!" over her shoulder.

So here we are, the consumers, and there's Stargate which we want to buy, and then there's the "fresh, new" Stargate that y'all are trying to peddle to us. And you're looking right past us when we tell you what we really want and how we're not interested in what you're trying to sell us now, and you're giving us the cold shoulder until we switch off your show and go elsewhere -- after all, how important could *we* be?

Look around, producers. You guys work on advertising dollars, right? And ratings determine how many advertising dollars you get, right? And you chased us off recently, so we had to go watch some *other* show -- right?

BIG mistake. Bye!

Heather Bungard Janney <heather@lapa.net (go ahead, I have a delete button)>
Lafayette, IN, USA - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 5:45 PM

i'm Kris and I am a 14 yeay old boy. I go scouting and camping. I like finding indian caves and stuff like that. I liked Daniel Jackson becuase he liked stuff like that. I watched stargate on showtime when it began becuase of the scifi stuf in it. It was fun and things were always hapening on it. Teal'c is awesome to.

Stargate got boring after a cople of years. Now its not even intersting. I dont watch it now. Its done stuped stuf and Jack has no one to talk to cuase Daniel is gone. Jack and Daniel were likie me and my friend Josh always doning stuf together.

If Daniel comes back it might get better for anyone who is goning to watch it.

Kris

Kris
Calcutta, Ohio - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 12:51 PM

To MGM and Ms. Hammer-- I've written before about my disappointment over MS leaving the series. I've tried watching Season 6 and my disappointment (along with alarm that such a wonderful series has taken such a terrible turn) still holds strong. I have two things to say and then I'll get out of your hair:

1) WHERE is the Stargate? Have they used it at all in Season 6 thus far? Why not change the name of the show if the original premise/device is no longer being utilized? I, for one, no longer recognize any of the remaining characters, and for the life of me, I cannot warm up to Corin Nemac. I think the writers have done him an injustice as to the way he was introduced and how his individuality was never allowed to develop. Seems like he's just THERE in hopes of distracting us from the giant HOLE that used to be Daniel. 2) Can't wait for "Abyss." Perhaps the intense surge of ratings for that episode will finally convince you all that MS/Daniel Jackson is THE favorite, most integral character and is sorely missed, desperately needed back. It's not too late!!!! Thanks, Jamie Kallio

Jamie K. <jlynn1972@hotmail.com>
Berkeley, IL/USA - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 12:40 PM

Dear Sir or Madam:

I would like to voice my contention over the new direction of Stargate SG-1. Not having Showtime, I've watched the show through Syndication since the beginning. I have not only watched myself but hooked my two Brothers, four neices and mother to the show as well.

I couldn't believe when the show moved to the Sci-Fi Channel. I thought the move would be great. Little did we realize that the shows move would coinside with a drastic and unfavorable change in the show. We have watched several shows but have completely lost interest. It's not just a matter of the Daniel Jackson replacement being a total bore, which he is, but that the whole shows direction seems to have changed. The team is gone. More episodes revolve around one or two characters and not about the team as they used to.

Daniel Jackson's Character was central to the show and the show just isn't worth watching without him. Please reconsider bring him back as its the only way this family will continue to watch on the Sci-Fi channel. In fact, we are all so upset that we are boycotting the Sci-Fi Channel itself until they bring back Michael Shanks. Until then, we will be content with watching old reruns on the local Channel.

Sincerely,

Roxanne Nossoughi
Suffern, New York, USA - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 12:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I have watched Stargate SG1 for several years now and was so excited to see it move to the Sci-Fi Channel figuring a bigger budget would help the show could continue for quite some time.

I can't tell you how dismayed I was to tune in to the first "new" episode to discover that the Character of Dr. Daniel Jackson had disappeard and that the show had changed so drastically.

The show used to be centered around a TEAM that went off to other worlds for the good of Earth. As a team they had become friends and hence there was a plot within a plot. Now, the friendship and team feel is gone. It has a Cold feeling now and even the story lines lack something.

Since I watched the show weekly with friends and family, I know that I am not the only one to feel this way. They too are thoroughly dissatisfied with the shows new direction.

Bottom line, as demographics goes, we are in the twenty-five to thirty five year old demographics: all have great jobs and spend plenty in advertising dollars. We have stopped watching the show after several disappointing episodes.

Two of us have even stopped watching the Sci-Fi Channel completely. After they pulled The Invisible Man yet kept the ridiculous Farscape and Lexx we were fuming.

Now after the Abyss episode with Daniel Jackson, I am putting a channel block on the Sci-Fi Channel completely-on all 6 Televisions.

I truly hope you will reconsider reprising the role of Daniel Jackson and restore the show. I really don't care why the actor left, bring him back!

Only then will I unblock the Sci-Fi Channel.

Sincerley,

Heidi Thorlo
Suffern, New York, USA - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:49 AM

Please reinstate Daniel Jackson to the show. The guy you have replacing him is in no way as interesting as the dynamics and knowledge that the Daniel Jackson character added. I really like the show but not without Daniel Jackson.

sincerely

jswest
albuquerque, NM, USA - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:47 AM

I have no idea what the hell producers were thinking, but Daniel Jackson and his knowledge of ancient Egypt and its "pictographs" was the sci-fi and academic foundation of the series and its vital concept!!!

What is the show without it? "Earth is threatened, send in the marines!" Bull Durham!

I have nothing against Corin Nemic can't lose (I forget his old show title). But talk about FILL! This alien has a photographic memory but a Spock/Data-like "innocence" when it comes to understanding humans. OK, boys. Nothing new, total rip-off, concept killer.

BRING BACK DANIEL JACKSON!!!!

John Powers
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:46 AM

i love watching stargate i have been a fan from the begining i love all of the original caracters that what makes the show stargate.with the original cast daniel jackson if you remember is the one who started the hole show by unlock the stargate.its is daniel jackson that makes the show worth watching becuse of him i want to learn more about reading different egypts writing.it is his caracterthe makes the show worth watching. it has not been worth watching without him.it becuse of daniel that i like to watch scifi movies. if mike does not come back to the show i dont want to watch it no more.it alright now but it will be a hole lot better if daniel jackson has come back to the show.i want to see daniel to the show i love it when daniel and oneil argue it would not be a show without it.

henry brough <henrywbrough@yahoo.com>
winchester, ky/usa - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:36 PM

I say that you guys are CRAZY, Michael's charactor is the whole reason I watch the series. we love the charactor of Dr. Daniel Jackson, my six year-old wants to grow up and follow in his footsteps. getting my child to read is hard, but as he's been watching the show and seeing all that Daniel can do, he now wan ts to read so he can be just as smart. If you do get rid of him then count me OUT as a #1 fan. I'll go back to watching something else. DANIEL JACKSON RULES.............

LOOK AT MY EMAIL ADDRESS YOU IDIOTS........

Melissa <iluvdjackson@stargatesg-1.com>
Long Beach, CA, USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:09 PM

Fay, the writers of this show have a vested interest in believing any rubbish the magazines make up, or if magazines won't make it up for them, making it up themselves. The show was better when Michael Shanks was in it and everyone told them that would be the case, including the other actors, now it's been proven and they are being publicly exposed with every lackluster episode that airs as wrong, wrong, WRONG. These are people who would bend the laws of mathematics to prove that 2 + 2 really *does* equal 5 if they'd counted wrong on their fingers in the first place. Of course they're going to try to muckrake about MS, otherwise what is there to distract Sci-Fi and MGM from how badly they've messed up, or to distract the cast and crew from the fact they're working fourteen hour days to make a show no one wants to watch any more?

Give up on them, I have. Dianne

Dianne Gulden
Harrisburg, PA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 9:46 PM

I just want to urge MGM to consider two things:

1) The character Daniel Jackson is so firmly imbedded in the lore and mythos of this story that is very painful to watch now without him. I used to watch every show now If it's on I may watch it! Up until last season for me and my family of 4 it was considered the best show on TV bar none! Now it does not really distinguish itself from any other series.

2) Why is Jack's Character being so obviously scaled down in importance!!? He is the poster boy for the show! The crux, the glue! This just seems like a situation where the writers are trying to fix something that is just not broken! Come on people, leave well enough alone. Don't over analyze.

With respect, Michael Saxon (Faithful watcher since season one)

Michael Saxon
USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 6:32 PM

I was waiting with much excitement when I heard Stargate would be on the Sci-Fi channel. What a sad day it was when i tuned in and Daniel Jackson wasn't a part of the show. I tried to watch but it just isn't the same. So now I only watch thr re-runs on another channel. Why would you take a wonderful show and screw it up. Please do something about bringing Daniel back. Michael brings such depth to the show. I miss him. Thank you for listening to a very disappointed viewer. I hope to be watching Stargate again WITH Michael Shanks.

Sincerely,

Karen DiLallo
Sacramento, CA, USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 6:30 PM

Dear Stargate fans, and most of all, Mister President of MGM

I'm french and I can tell you that, in France, the character of Daniel Jackson is very appreciated. Actually we love him. Please take him back!!! SG1 needs such a character, such an actor! Mickeal Shanks is incredible! In france we love the show, but the former team, especially Daniel, are the soul of Stargate!Take him back! We need him, and YOU need him!

I thank you for you're attention, and I'm sure you will take the right decision.

a sincere fan,

Christelle from Paris
Paris, France - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 6:29 PM

Hell... It was almost Stargate Day here in Portugal... The Stargate Movie followed by 2 episodes of season 4... After having this overdose (well... to much is never enough) I come to try to imagine stargate without Daniel... Come on... He figured it all out in the first movie... And he did pretty well in the actions sequences... And in the series... Well... They are letting the excelent actor that Shanks is going away... As much as we like Richard Anderson, we know that the Duet of him and Daniel is thecenter of the all story... And please... I can't stand Sam and her super brain especially in this season (4 in Portugal). She solves everything and some episodes are REALLY (I MEAN REALLY!!) Boring... Man... We saw "Absolute Power" a few weeks ago, and because the channel that airs Stargate repeats the same episode 4 times a week (Yes... the show diserves it) I saw it 4 times and man... that episode rules... I was always a fan of the movie and caught the series in the middle of season 2... (saw a couple of episodes of season 1). I'm sad that he is leaving... And with his new "form" he gain a lot of potencial... Or I guess it isn't possible to bring him back because he could exterminate all Goa'uld with an eye blink!

Bruno Malveiro <bruno.malveiro@mail.telepac.pt>
Lisbon, Portugal - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 6:15 PM

Thank you Sci-Fi Channel!

I realize it was just a 10 second preview that I was so touched by last night, but it was SO well done. Last night, I sat through the episode Nightwatchers simply because I wanted just a glimpse of Michael Shanks. I think the preview was so nicely built up by, the Sci-Fi Channel, that I am tempted to record the Sci-Fi Channel every day this week just to watch that simple, magical moment over and over!

I am sorry to bring negativity into this post, but that preview made sitting through parts of Nightwatchers SO worth it. I am trying here, honestly. But, this episode was so poor that I couldn't restrain myself from flipping between the episode, the movie Forest Gump, and the first part of an X-File cliff-hanger.:( THANK YOU FOR GIVING US ABYSS!

EPT <EarlyPrimaryTeacher@yahoo.com>
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 3:16 PM

To the "writers" of Stargate SG1 season six...I have a question for you , when is a homage not a homage? When it's a RIP OFF stupid!!!!!Enough with the X- Files crap already.THAT show is DEAD Stargate is breathing it's last wake up.And for God's sake use the damn Stargate will you.I like so many ,many ,MANY others will watch Abyss but that's it until you get Michael Shanks back, if he will come back that is.You screwed up BIG TIME.

claire <private>
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 3:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern,

I have read every interview given by Michael Shanks and I am increasingly bewildered as to why such a polite young man, who has gone out of his way to speak nothing but praise about his fellow actors and to give praise where it is due even to the writers of this show (many of whom have sadly fallen short in recent seasons as pointed out by innumerable viewers) should be the subject of so much hostility and vitriol from the producers of this show. Mallozzi, Wright and Cooper have all been unpleasant in several interviews and on-line 'chats' while Michael Shanks has been nothing but kind.

Shame on the lot of you. You really are old enough to know better and it makes me wonder why he would want to have anything to do with the people in charge in Canada at all. Looking at the way the show is going and the way his career is going, I would say you definitely need him a lot more than he needs you. Perhaps you need to stop be honest enough to admit that you were wrong and he was right about the mistakes you were making in the direction the show was taking. Last night's episode was an absolute disgrace and was nothing other than an "X-Files" episode in Stargate clothing. In the long run, admitting you were wrong and he was right could only benefit the show and may make you a little more honest in your dealings with people in the future as well. It would certainly earn you more respect from this viewer than your current petty and hostile attitude to Michael Shanks.

A previously satisfied, now very disappointed viewer,

Fay Scarre-Brown <private>
Main Street, Westminster , MD 21157 - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 1:46 PM

I am also counting the days until "Abyss". An additional pleasant surprise is that my local channels running "Beneath the Surface" this week and "Upgrade" next week. After a long no Stargate time for me at last I can look forward to some quality Jonass free Stargate!!

S.Savola <smsavola@hotmail.com>
Green Bay, WI - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 11:09 AM

While I understand Michael Shanks' reasons for leaving, I think it is a shame that we, the fans, have lost the pivotal relationship between Jack and Daniel. What I feel the producers have not realised is how important that relationship is to the show, and how important Daniel's character is to the show in general. As an English viewer, today was the first I have heard of the departure and I was shocked. I respect Micheal Shanks' decision, but felt obligated to add my voice to those complaining. The show will be less without him and the film not worth viewing if he is not there. I strongly advise the producers of Stargate SG1 to invite Michael Shanks back as a full time member of the cast.

Hannah Corry
Dorking, Surrey, England - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:50 AM

Last night I and my family watched Dead Zone on Sci Fi. We liked it. I saw the many promos for Stargate SG-3/4 - 1 during Dead Zone and was not intrigued by the story line and as I have not been watching the "new team" this season I did not tune in.

I did some computer work from 9pm to 10pm while my husband watched the show and taped the last 15 minutes of SG 3/4 - 1 for me in order to see the promo for Abyss. This is the first time that my husband has watched the "new" Stargate SG-1 and boy, did I get an earful at 10pm.

The adjectives that he used to describe the new show "boring", "flat", "no chemistry", "is this 'Stargate'?, "What happened to the characters? Sam isn't Sam, Teal'C isn't Teal'C, and the new guy is just 'There'! And...Where the hell is O'Neill?" "What have they done to the show? Did they get new writers?" Sounds like he didn't like the "Fresh New Perspective". Ya think?

Then he told me about the announcement that Sci Fi made about a special preview of Stargate SG-1 Abyss episode with Michael Shanks showing "9 minutes" into Farscape. Neat little trick, don't you think? I would watch just about anything to see Michael Shanks as Daniel Jackson together with Richard Dean Anderson so we watched 10 1/2 minutes into Farscape to see the preview and then turned off the TV and went to bed. Calculate that into your ratings Sci-Fi.

Get Michael Shanks as Dr. Daniel Jackson back on this show ASAP or it is a certainly a lost cause! I and my family will watch any episode (or movie) that is made with the original team, preferably with Daniel (Michael Shanks) in human, solid form and on the team rather than as a mystical cloud

Message to Brad Wright: It is "NOT" so difficult to write Daniel back into the scripts as you mentioned in a recent statement. You wrote him into this corner, you can write him back out of it. It is your choice to do so. You're a writer/Produceer, correct?

I suggest that you take a look at your writing staff as well. The other actors might have stood a chance of making it work if the writing hadn't slipped so badly. Wake up and smell the ratings!!!

I will be taping Abyss next week and my whole family will watch the tape (we all agree that we want to "FF" through the painful "not our team anymore" sections). We are all really looking forward to seeing Richard Dean Anderson and Michael Shanks do their thing bringing Jack and Daniel alive for us once again.

Thanking you in advance for Abyss and hoping that we will be seeing MUCH MORE of our wonderful, beloved "original SG-1" in the future!

Sharyn and family

Sharyn <sharyn@shadowmyst.com>
Centereach, NY - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 9:53 AM

I first stumbled upon Stargate via an excursion to Blockbusters. I was impressed by the story, dialogue, and chemistry of the actors. Now I'm referring to the original motion picture at this point. I was shocked that such a good movie could slip past me. Then as I continued to muse over the motion picture, one Sunday I was surprised to see that it was converted into a television show. I watched the first few shows as a skeptic, fully expecting to be disappointed...but I was blown away. The diversity of the team and the chemistry they shared kept me coming back as unofficially the show's biggest fan. Now I may be a little slow on the uptake, i.e. finding out about Daniel's departure, but I am sorely saddened by the news. Chemistry between actors and actresses is the indispensible element that turns causal views into faithful followers. Please restore the show to its former luster. Bring back Daniel I implore you.

Derek <lov2wor@hotmail.com>
Baltimore, Maryland - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 9:35 AM

I am a senior citizen so you'll know I'm not a yearning young lady. Daniel Jackson helped make Stargate SG 1 a hit. He's needed to keep the great blend of actors in the show. I can under stand why he just wants as much acting time as the rest of the cast. You had a great cast that blended together very well. If you don't bring him back and add some one else the blend will never be the same. Please bring him back or you lose an actor that helped make this a hit series.

Kay Patterson
Navarre, Florida, USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 6:39 AM

I don't know why Michael Shanks is not on Stargate-SG1 is on the any longer, but until you get him back, you have lost this viewer. The entire chemistry of show is ruined.

Michael's role, his unique perspective of his character, can't be replaced. Certainly not by this new guy, who looks like he should leading a cheer leading squad at some University.

With Rick Anderson's only appearing in only 15 episodes, you have managed to accomplish to make the show a FUBAR.

Fix it, before it goes TV Heaven. I not only speak for myself, but everyone I know that that loved the show no longer is a fan. As I'm writing this, the episode airing has Amanda Tapping, Chris Judge, and the new guy. It sucks.

The only episode I will watch is when Michael Shanks makes his guest appearance.

Get with the program!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ALAN FELDMAN
LAUDERHILL, Florida, USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 6:38 AM

Glad to see Daniel back in one episode. We would rather see him back in every show. The new guy just doesn't fit in. I don't enjoy the chemistry of this group as much.

lisa burnette
fairview, NC, USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 3:30 AM

I am deeply disappointed that such good writers could 'jump the shark' and turn a great show into yet another fizzling joke. Why was Seinfeld such a success? Because they stayed true to the original premise of the show. I don't know what happened behind the scenes and I do not care. All I know is that you seem to have lost focus and dropped the ball on your audience.

It is so hard to find TV that is fun and smart and NOT mindeless formula hunks hitting each other, or formula sit-coms pausing for the laugh track or silicon (boobs) in tight suits. Unfortunately for me (and the advertisers who are desperate to reach my wallet) I am very choosy about the mind candy I ingest. When a show lets me down I pick up a book. Not only did I really like the Daniel character (and Michael Shanks' portrayal of that character), but I really liked the blend of all the characters. It was a great ensemble that depended on the 'history' the characters had together. I can't wait to see "Abyss", but I expect to be dissapointed because Daniel and Jack without the humor and banter... Well, it is lke the writers of Seinfeld killing off George and elevating Newman.

ICK

Please, tell me this is all just a bad dream ... oops, that's been done. Oh well,

Jeanie Martinez-Jantz
Coconut Creek, Florida, USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 3:29 AM

Dear PTB:

This show is called Stargate SG-1, right? I didn't dream that, did I?

Um ... what are the chances these people are actually going to go THROUGH THE STARGATE this season? Is this that fresh, new perspective we were promised? Hangin around Earth, imitating old X-file shows, and trying (vainly) to get Jonas Quinn to grown on us like a foot fungus?

Oh, that's right. You let Michael Shanks walk without protest. As a result, Daniel Jackson ascended leaving this show sorely void of quality, interest, and entertainment value. And you lost the respect of a MAJORITY of legitimate, long-time, savvy, fans.

Buck up and take responsibility, folks. You blew it. Not Michael Shanks. Not this campaign. You. Now make it right! Bring Daniel Jackson back and send Jonas packing. Make sure he takes his ridiculously tight shirts, swim fins, and his inexplicable ability to withstand massive gamma radiation bombardment with him. We don't want a Daniel-clone. We want Daniel back. We want the team back. We want Stargate SG-1 back.

What you'll get in return are better ratings, a grateful fandom, and something that should appeal to those who like the bottom line; more advertising dollars due to higher ratings. Right?

Seriously, guys, you know what to do to make this right. Please, swallow your pride and fix this. Give this show and the fans who got you here what we deserve: a great show with quality writing, its original team and original spirit restored.

You're not as limited creatively-speaking as you claim to be. This is sci-fi, anything is possible. Hell, you could drive a planet through the plot holes and continuity errors plaguing this show right now.

Please. A weary and disappointed fandom are looking to you.

Thank you.

Marcia
St. Louis, MO USA - Saturday, July 13, 2002, 3:06 AM

I have thought about the current situation of SG1 member Daniel Jackson long and hard. And I have pretty much decided that this can be fixed. I mean you are talking about Science Fiction here. I agree with the most recent interview I read- anything can happen.

I just wanted to ask you a question. After seeing the reaction of the fans and the impact of the decision to let Michael Shanks walk, why do you not do everything you can to bring him back? I would think that keeping the fans happy should be your main goal. Afterall, without them, you would not even need to make the show. Why not try to keep them happy? Or at the very least, don't kill off their favorite character.

Another testimony of Daniel Jackson's importance to the show was my father's reaction. He is a long time Sci-Fi fan and tries to keep up with all his favorites. Since he is a full time missionary and spends most of his time out of the country it is hard for him to watch the shows on a regular basis. I record them for him and send them back with him so that he can watch them at his convenience.

When I told him that Daniel Jackson was killed in the last episode, I was surprised by his reaction. He was very upset. His exact words were, "Are you kidding? He is the main reason I watch the show!" I thought he might be confusing him with Jack O'Neill so I questioned him to make sure he was thinking of the right character and he said, "Yeah, I know who he is, he's the doctor guy who knows all the cool stuff." Need I say more?

Clearly this is not just a female issue. As many men feel the same way as the women. Please bring Daniel Jackson back on a regular basis.

Sincerely,

Sariah Frye
Independence, MO, USA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 5:32 PM

Dear Sirs:

Daniel Jackson is essential to SG1. His archaeology knowledge is the balance to Sam's technical knowledge. It is the balance between the two and the interrelationship between the 4 members of SG1 that makes the team work and brings us back every week.

My husband and I have been watching since the first year. We believe Daniel's approach to all the new worlds visited makes everything more real and human. We need him back. Someone said he is the "heart and soul" of the show/team. I would agree with that. It has been a wonderful ensemble cast and it would be smart creative/business sense to bring him back. There are so many more possible storylines with him on board.

I strongly urge you to bring Daniel back which will show your respect for the reputation these 4 hardworking actors have earned over the past 4 years. We will continue to watch, but very much want Daniel back!!

Thank you for seriously considering this request. It can only benefit you to bring him back!!

Carole Schmidt
Seattle, Washington, USA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 2:45 PM

Respected Sir.

VERY, VERY bad mistake to remove Daniel Jackson from S.G.1. as he was the perfect foil to Jack's authority.

Geoffrey Wynne
Chester, Cheshire, UK - Friday, July 12, 2002, 2:21 PM

Bring Daniel back before the show descends further into the toilet!!!!! He really made the show what it used to be. I can't tell you how happy I am to hear that he'll be on further episodes, there is a bond between Jack and Daniel that no one could ever fill the way they did. I'm not trying to take any credit away from the new guy but he should be working as Daniel's assistant not replacing him. After all, what does he know about the stargate program? Except how to ruin it.

Thank you so much for letting Daniel back on the show.

Ruthie Joe White
Pawtucket, RI, USA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 2:19 PM

Hurray Daniel Jackson will be back. I will be sure to watch. I really think Daniel Jackson is an important component to the show and have really missed him. I still am an ardent watcher of Star Gate SG 1 but really do miss him, it's just not the same.

Thanks again - lets have some more, please.

Donna McCauley
Mooreton, ND, USA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 2:17 PM

Common guys! Lets focus on quality programing! Bring Michael back ASAP! That other guys is OK but he is not an acceptable Daniel substitute!

jeff <crazyfox@attbi.com>
Renton, WA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 12:36 PM

Please return Michael Shanks to his crucial role as Daniel Jackson in Stargate SG-1... he started it all... he should be there at the end...

Jaret Clifton
Federal Way, WA, USA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 8:10 AM

Dear Sir,

I ask that you please give Michael Shanks the option to return the Stargate SG1. I feel his role as Daniel Jackson is extremely important to the show. I also ask that you give Michael Shanks the support he so wants, as he is a very important part of the story line. Stargate SG1 series is just not the same without him. Please return Michael Shanks to his role of Daniel Jackson as soon as possible.

Thanks for your time and cooperation regarding this matter,

Pauline Chohonis
Miami, Florida, USA - Friday, July 12, 2002, 8:10 AM

No No No NO You can't drop a major character like that!!!! Don't tear the SG1 family apart. I am very disappointed and in all honesty, this has killed much of the magic for me. Bring Daniel back.

Laura <dancarmom@hotmail.com>
Vancouver, B.C. Canada - Friday, July 12, 2002, 2:21 AM

I have been watching Stargate SG1 for a long time. I really have an appreciation for the show. But removing "Daniel Jackson" from the series is a very large mistake. He brings a balance to the other characters. The relationship between him and "Jack" is what gives SG1 the twist it needs to make an ok show into a great one. The conflicts of personality that they overcome throughout the show is what brings a depth of soul to the series. Please bring him back, before you loose too many viewers. Remember all things are possible in sci-fi. Mrs. Norma Gene

Mrs. Norma Gene <mrsted@telus.net>
Victoria, BC Canada - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 7:30 PM

Please bring Daniel Jackson (Michael Shanks) back as a regular character on SG-1. The show is just not the same without him. I really do not like the new character. Daniel and Jack were the two main characters from the movie and the series. Now you have cut the show in half. Michael Shanks is such a great actor and was the perfect partner for Jack. Whatever it takes, please bring him back.

Vicki Thornton
Deatsville, Alabama, USA - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 4:48 PM

I would like to express my dismay at the leaving of Michael Shanks' Daniel Jackson character from the Stargate SG-1 TV show. I starting watching SG-1 because of Richard Dean Anderson, but I have to admit I still have trouble seeing McGuyver carrying a gun and acting dumb.

The redeeming factor in the mix was Dr. Daniel Jackson. Smart and sincere, he balanced the team. I beleive that the sentiments of the actor Michael Shanks are justified. Dr. Jackson's role was often trivialized. In addition, the show is becoming more and more war-like. In this more frieghtening world, do we really need to see more and more war, no matter how fictionalized?

Please consider refocusing the direction of Stargate-SG1 to include a more cerebral format that includes Dr. Jackson in an important role. I also understand that a movie is being planned, personally, I vote for a prominent role for Dr. Jackson.

The last time I wrote a letter to a TV show was 35 years ago, as young nursing student, in an effort to save the original Star Trek. You will note that I and many other letter writers were correct. The life of Star Trek has been very long and prosperous. Wouldn't it be great if Stargate's fictional life were equally long and prosperous?

Sincerely, Marie Ellen Case, RN,BSN

PS I love the role of Dr. Frasier as well.

Marie Ellen Case, RN, BSN
Bethlehem, PA, USA - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:35 PM

First I would like to say that I love Stargate SG-1. But without Daniel it just is not interesting anymore. I don't laugh at some of the stupid ways he would make Jack mad and that new guy's character is way over written and doesn't fit into the group. Can you not see that you have made a mistake by not trying to write better parts for the character Daniel Jackson? I mean your ratings suck and repeats of episodes from previous seasons are getting higher ratings than this new season.

I do understand that it was Michael's choice to leave and he did because you would not address his concerns about him feeling like wallpaper. I am sure you have heard all this before from other fans but my one question is why are you not doing anything about it? It makes no sense to me why you would of continued to film the season when there were so many complaints. And this new guy's saving the planet just to try to get us to like him as a character is so dumb because in the past seasons it was a TEAM effort and in this new season (6) it is all the new guy.

If I were you and I saw that the change in character really had that much affect on my shows ratings I would pull the show scrap the rest of the episodes I have mande without Daniel and start over. Leave the new guys there he can be in the show, just get Michael back under contract and re-film the rest of the episodes. I know that would cost money but heck you're already losing money without Daniel's character in the show and if you brounght him back I think you could get a few sponsors really easy to help out with funding to make the new episodes because they would know for sure that we would watch the show as long and Daniel Jackson was back on the team.

We saw one of his kind choose to take human form so we all know that he could choose to be human again. Just do it and all us fans would be very happy and watch the show.

THANK YOU

Desirae Lewis
Washington Terrace, Utah, USA - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:33 PM

Dear MGM, I beg of you Please Please do not let Michael Shanks leave the show, as many have said he is the heart and soul of the stargate series. And if you take him out most of the magic of the series will have left with him. Thank you for your time

Nathan Grim
Loveland, CO, USA - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:29 PM

Ever since its inception, I have used both the original Stargate film and television series to teach my Sec. 4 and Sec. 5 English Language Arts courses.

Hundreds of my students have benefitted from these episodes and Dr. Daniel Jackson, Michael Shanks, was the primary reason. Michael played the one character my students identified with the most. From character sketches, to essays and fictional narratives that these students produced for me, it was always the complexity and depth of the Jackson character that they found leant the series its "raison d'etre".

I can understand why Michael felt his character was not explored to its full potential and his ensuing frustration. I find it sad that the show's producers did so little to accommodate his more than reasonable expectations and were content to let him go without remonstrance.

The consequence of all this? The Stargate show will have 160 viewers less, my students and myself, every future episode and season that it runs!

Thank you.

Cecilia Lopes
Pierrefonds, Quebec, Canada - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:27 PM

Dear Hank Cohen,

I am writing this letter because of my utter dissapointment with your writing out Daniel Jackson of Stargte SG-1. I began watching Stargate about three years ago, my favorie part of the show was Daniel Jackson. He was quirky, intruiging and cute. I hadn't watched the show for a few weeks because I had been on vacation, when I turned the show on one Friday, I was shocked to see Jonas instead of Daniel. Now, it's not that I don't like Jonas, but, I want Daniel back. I believe that Daniel, in my opinion, made the show. I plan on boycotting the show until Daniel returns. I will, however, watch "abyss" to support Daniel's return. I urge you to bring Daniel back, or you may lose viewers. Thank you for your time.

Brooke Blough
Louisville, Ohio, USA - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:25 PM

To whom it may concern,

I am very upset that Dr. Daniel Jackson will not be involved very much with the SG-1 team as before. Daniel Jackson has touched my heart and he is my most favourite character on the show. I loved the way Daniel was in the series because I was a big fan of the first Stargate movie with James Spader and Kurt Russell. I wish that Michael Shanks had stayed on and played the very much loved character Daniel Jackson, but I support his decision to leave.

I hope that Daniel Jackson will have more appearances in the show and hopefully one day he will once again be a main character not some spiritual guru. I will miss watching Jack and Daniel have those arguments and the way Daniel was always willing to help out. My biggest wish though is that Daniel Jackson will be a lead character in the up-coming Stargate movie, as I don't think that the movie would be quite right unless Daniel was in it.

I wish Michael Shanks all the best and I really hope the fans get their wishes of Daniel Jackson being restored to his rightful place in the show and a lead role in the up-coming movie.

Thanks,

Rose Matijevic
Sydney, NSW, Australia - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:22 PM

DANIEL JACKSON MUST RETURN! Daniel Jackson was the heart and soul of the Stargate project. Since the movie he has been the one who has been able to unravel the mysteries of the many diverse cultures which SG-1 encounters. It was Daniel Jackson who deciphered the cartuche and was able to identify the seventh symbol which activated the gate for the first time. To exclude Daniel Jackson from the TV series would be like taking the very essence that makes Stargate SG-1 what it is. Michael Shanks was able to bring this character to life in an extrordinary way, let him continue giving this character life.

Arthur Salinas
Pasadena, Texas, USA - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:20 PM

Sirs -

I am writing to express my disgust at first the diminishing and now dissolving of the character 'Daniel Jackson' from Stargate. This has been one of our favourite series since its inception and part of the pleasure has always been the quiet stability and thread of common-sense provided by this character. His position of archaeologist/ anthropologist gave the storylines and thus the series something missing from almost all Sci-fi series - reality!

Stargate has always come over as 'life as it could be' rather than a shoot 'em up, gungho piece of nonsense.

Why is it that when TV producers produce TV really worth watching, with a good team of actors, providing us with believable characters, some twerp comes along and thinks they know better - well, I'm here to tell you they don't.

Here in Yorkshire we have a saying which we see as commonsense and which you would be advised to take note of, if you value your viewing figures. It is as follows: 'If it ain't broke - don't try to fix it, stupid!'

Well, I have had my say and I would just like to add that I am writing not just for myself but for our extended family of fans - no-one rings anyone while SG-1 is on! - This includes the Newtons, the Carlines,the Connells, the Kellys, the Bruces, the Collins's and an assortment of Browns, Fells and Thackra's - about 235 in all,

Yours sincerely

Patricia Newton-Carline
Doncaster, South Yorkshire, England - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 2:19 PM

Hi.

Im not good at wirting letters so i am going this onr thing. I f Daniel Jackson leaves the show, it will be the end of it. It is the greatest show ever and he just put the cream on the cake.

If he goes the entre show goes with him. I hope that he doesnt go.

Jeremy Hobley <germ544@hotmail.com>
Albany, Australia - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 9:33 AM

I am writing from Singapore. Here in Singapore, we do not get the Stargate SG-1 series. However I am an avid DVD collector and about a year ago, I decided to purchase the first season of the Stargate series.

From the 1st episode, I was HOOKED. Since then, I have religiously purchased every episode of the series. I AM A FAN!!! I have just come across this website and SHOCKED to hear that Michael Shanks is being written out of the show. The original Stargate concept was based on the Daniel Jackson character. To remove him is like saying that we remove Cpt James T Kirk from the original Star Trek series or Cpt Jean-Luc Picard from Star Trek, the next generation.

It makes a mockery of the show and no true fan will stand for it!

BRING HIM BACK!!!!!!

Richard Singapore

Richard Choong <richieleo@hotmail.com>
SINGAPORE, Singapore - Thursday, July 11, 2002, 12:00 AM

Hi! I personally canot believe how anybody can consider "removing" Daniel Jackson from Stargate, let alone 'kill him off' which is what happened. In my opinion Daniel is the most intelligent and sexy person on the prongrame and removing him will ruin it. it will also shatter people as I know I am not the only one who admires him. He is soooooooooooooooooooooo nice!!!!! ;) Keep him!!!

Emma
Fleetwood, England - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 4:16 PM

Sir, My neighbor introduced your show to me last year and I loved it at first sight. With Jack and Daniel playing off each other, Teal'c observing them all with humour and Sam loving Jack but not saying it.....it is rather an addiction of mine now. I did try to watch the new guy this season, I tried twice and I tried very hard to like him. But, the magic is gone. The club has lost a member and is not a club anymore. It's just four people and I am sorry to tell you I won't be watching unless the reruns with Daniel are on.

I only have one question. Respectfully, "Why fix it if it isn't broken and WHAT WERE YOU THINKING"? Maybe that is two questions but still, you literally shot yourself in the foot on purpose. It makes no sense...the changes as well as the new season.

Please, I am disabled and live through others. Like Daniel Jackson. Bring him back. Please.

Sincerely,

Shirley Ingram
California City, CA, USA - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 4:00 PM

Hi. I am extremely disturbed and shocked to find out about the gorgeous Daniel Jackson leaving the show. He was and is the only reason why I watch Stargate: his looks and personality have kept me on tenterhooks for years now and when he leaves, well what can I say, I simply will not watch it any more as there is no incentive to do so. Please consider what an asset Daniel is to the team and beg Mr Shanks to come back. (Not least because he is the most beautiful man I have seen in a a long time :)) Thanks

Claire <devilishclaire_uk@yahoo.co.uk>
London, England - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 3:17 PM

Dear MGM, SciFi Channel, and Brad Wright,

I am very disappointed that Dr. Daniel Jackson has been written out of season six of Stargate SG-1. I became a fan and the original movie and started watching the show in syndication. However, I finally signed up for cable just to get caught up with the new season. You can’t image my shock when I found out that one of the main characters and personally my favorite character has been removed. You have made a terrible mistake by failing to build one of Stargate’s key characters, moreover, by removing the main character from the original movie! Daniel balances out the excellent ensemble of characters, without him you lose so much (for example, the wonderful bantering between Jack and Daniel, which in my opinion is far better to watch than the so call romance between Sam and Jack).

I hope you call take a lesson from Chris Carter. When Mulder left the X-files it was the beginning of the end! If fact I refused to watch after Mulder’s exit (which was more graceful than Daniel's).

I believe you can put aside personal issues involving the actor Michael Shank. Please do what in the best interest for the show and the fans by not only bringing Daniel back to the show, but also taking the interest to build his character arc.

Sincerely,

Heather Schloneger
Alliance, Ohio, USA - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 2:22 PM

Hi, MGM

I am a totally fan of Stargate SG-1 and of course I am fan of Michael Shanks, becuase I think that his play is the best of all.

I beleive it is stupid to continue the TV program with out Daniel, because his rol is one of the most important of the serie and besides the series began with the search of his wife and that meant that Daniel could be one of the principal characters there and because he is the most intelligent of everybody, without Daniel, they could be daed in many times.

I don't not know the real reason of his departure but without Daniel, the show is going to lose audience becuase personally I only watch the series because I like Michael's role.

So please, don't take him away from the series and if it is going to be a new movie, make sure he will be there.

Thank you. Cordially,

Ana María Niño Díaz
Bogotá, D.C., Cundinamarca, Colombia - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 2:20 PM

I can't imagine what the sixth and final series of Stargate will be like without the character of Daniel Jackson. To me he was the heart and soul of the whole thing, the man who opened the Stargate and introduced us to a universe filled with adventure. Somehow it won't be the same without him, and personally I feel unwilling to watch the show without him.

The four members of SG-1 were a perfect team, each one an enigma in their own right. I think it would have been better to have left them as a team of three, being joined occasionally by a regular guest, Major Davis from the Pentagon for example. Introducing a brand new character for what is presumably the last series of what has been up until now an excellent programme is ridiculous. The audience will hardly get used to the guy before it's all over.

What I don't understand is why it was and seeminly still is so easy for the writers to come up with stories for the other characters, but not for Daniel. There has never to my knowledge been a Sam/Daniel story or a Teal'c/Daniel story, As a writer of very well received (so far) fan fiction, I feel I could have done what the professional script writers failed to do. Give Michael Shanks something to get his teeth into. After all the guy wasn't asking for more money, just something decent to do, other than stand around reacting with his eyebrows at what the others were doing.

I am pleased to hear that Michael will be returning for the episode Abyss, which will be the first proper Jack/Daniel story. I hope he will be able to appear in more episodes, and the movie if and when it's made. I wish Michael Shanks every good wish in his career. From what I've seen so far, he's doing very well, but I still miss Daniel.

Sue Barrett
Swindon, Wiltshire, UK - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 2:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern,

SG1 is my favourite show and I believe that Daniel Jackson is an essential part of the show. When I first found out that he is no longer part of the SG1 team having been written out at the end of Series 5 I was very upset. Being from Australia the episode in which he leaves the show has not yet been screened however I am sure that it will be received here with much emotion. I can only beg you to ask Michael Shanks to return as the character Daniel Jackson as he is my favourite and I believe an intregal part of the SG1 team. I am sure that there is a way to bring him back to life. Even if he guest stars in a few more episodes at least we will still be able to see his friendly face.

Please bring back Daniel Jackson.

Karen Kaden
Cranebrook, NSW, Australia - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 2:16 PM

Mr. Cohen,

We are very dissappointed with the loss of the Daniel Jackson Character from Stargate SG-1. My family and I have been watching the program since the first season and I have also drawn in my roomate over the past two seasons. Daniel is possibly the most essential character in the show, being one of only two characters that have existed right from the original movie. He is pretty foundational.

SG-1 has always been a team of 4. The same 4. We have watched as the team has developed so well over the seasons; frankly there will always be something missing without Daniel.

I am not certain if we will stop watching the show or not because of this loss but we are expecting to be annoyed as other characters attempt to do the impossible and fill the gap that Daniel has left. I hope that the final season won't be a total disappointment by becoming all about the special effects and neglecting the important character and team interactions.

We want Daniel back. Don't write him out of the final season of what has been a great show so far.

Sincerely, Shera Whitnack Jim Whitnack Camille Dumond Peter Young

Shera Whitnack
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 2:15 PM

Write him back into the show damn it. If your going to change the CAST change them all to add a new atmosphere to the "NEXT GENERATION"

Super Dave <David@JohnsonMcKibben.com>
Dallas, Tx - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 12:37 PM

Danial is more likeable of "Stargate SG-1" and sexier than Tilk. By By 'xx

Fabiana <sagittarius31284@hotmail.com>
prato, italy - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 11:26 AM

Daniel is perhaps the highlight to the show. please dont leave him behind, it would terrible to have to watch the crew, without such an bright, thoughtful character (who is very pleasing to the eye as well! :) )

DONT LET HIM GO!

M Ward <maxybaby@yahoo.com.au>
Brisbane, QLD Australia - Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 12:47 AM

Daniel is the heart, the brains,the reason for Stargate..BRING HIM BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jean <KITZABURGER@IWON.COM>
TWIN LAKES, WI - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 10:38 PM

I just read the news updates for July 8 on this site. To Mr. Anderson, Mr. Wright and Mr. Cooper, thank you. I still miss Daniel terribly and would love to see him come back as often as possible, but your kind words in the recent interviews has done much to heal this wounded soul. Again, thank you, gentleman.

Rowe <ladybug67401@yahoo.com>
Salina, KS - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 10:25 PM

I am so glad the show is continuing on Sci-Fi, but I am very disappointed that "Daniel" won't be starring. The writers are going to have to do some more fancy writing to fill his shoes...but the fact is there is no way they will ever fill his shoes. He balances the team out. He grounds them and in a way represents normal everyday people like me...He's the civilian!!! Please, beg him to come back. The show will die without him.

Sherry Templeton <ssgz@charter.net>
Piedmont, SC - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 7:36 PM

I was thrilled that Stargate II was coming out with new episodes and on Sci-fi. I was shocked that Jackson was no longer part of the cast, he is a vital part of what makes this show GREAT!!! PLEASE BRING HIM BACK!!!! SOON!!!!

THANKS, RHONDA

Rhonda Carling-Marden
Placerville, CA, USA - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 6:49 PM

Dont be stupid, Daniel is a key member of the storyline and damn well better return or I and a lot of other fans won't.

Scott Sussman
Chelmsford, MA, USA - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 4:55 PM

I have only just found out about the departure of Dr Daniel Jackson's character. Having read his reason's for leaving, I can understand why he wishs to leave, but why, oh why have the studio's allowed this situation to occur in the first place. The character or Dr Daniel Jackson is integral to the series, he is the one person that keeps the SG1 team firmly planted in reality, he is the language interpretor, anthropologist/archeologist. He is the one essential charater who's departure will destroy the whole feel of the series. Without this character SG1 will be totally and utterly useless, who else can keep them together and, god words just fail me, this is the most stupid move I have ever seen in a TV series. Let him go and the ratings will dive in the UK.

Yours sincerely Malcolm A Carline, a loyal and dedicated fan.

Malcolm Austin Carline
Doncaster, South Yorkshire, UK - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 4:54 PM

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you to show you my concerns of the 'removal' of Daniel Jackson from the StarGate SG-1 series.

I feel that Daniel Jackson is a very important role in the series as he adds innocence and naivity to the show, aswell as a fierce passion for his cause. So as you have 'removed' Daniel from the series you have affectively removed the innocence and naivity and passion from the show. As an affect from removing from the character you will lose a great many fans.

So please, please, reinstate the Daniel Jackson character!! Thank you for your kind attention.

Michelle Batley
Bristol, UK - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 4:52 PM

I simply want Michael Shanks to return to the SG-1 team the quicker, the better. Without him something is missing, so please Michael come back!

Katalin Florkievitz
Brasov, Romania - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 4:49 PM

Hi.

Several months ago, before Season Six started, I made predictions that it wouldn't do well without Daniel Jackson, as played by Michael Shanks, on your show. I also promised, *promised* that "I won't gloat unless I'm right."

So now, the ratings are coming in for the first episodes of Season Six -- or, as some fans have taken to calling it, "Season Sucks." Redemption part 1 garnered lower ratings than the series ever received while on Showtime, a pay cable network with a smaller overall audience. There was much speculation about what these numbers meant, but the general consensus was that even of the rating points *did* represent a gain in actual viewers, it wasn't the huge leap that the Powers That Be were expecting when they were trying to shove a Daniel-less SG-1 down our throats.

And NOW, this week, we have the ratings from Redemption Part 2 to look at. Apparently two-parter episodes usually mark an increase in ratings as more viewers tune in to see what happens in the second half of the episode. Did that happen with Redemption?

Nope.

Did the ratings maintain at the same level?

Nope.

The ratings on Sci-Fi for Redemption Part 2 dropped, from 1.8 to 1.6, which represents a drop in viewership of over 100,000 households.

I guess it's time to keep my promise.

You didn't know what kind of asset you had in the talents and personal strength of character that Michael Shanks brought to the series. You let all of that go, rather than swallow your pride and admit that he was right -- that your creativity has apparently begun to fizzle, since you couldn't seem to come up with anything for his character to do, and you systematically reduced the other characters to cardboard cutouts, and your plots to cliches.

You didn't know what you had in the fictitious character, Daniel Jackson. Some of the writers have more or less admitted that they don't watch the episodes that include him, and apparently never watched the original movie to see just how important this character was to the entire premise behind the series. So you let that go, too, rather than open your eyes and see the truth that was right in front of you all along.

You didn't know what you had in the fans who watched the show. Apparently you had no clue about the very nature of science fiction fandom -- how loyal we can be, how dedicated to something that entertains us while respecting our intelligence. Do you know how hard it is to find a show that does that? Once we find one, we will latch onto it and fight to keep it. But you let that go, too, when you belittled us as a bunch of "girls" (I can hear the sneer in your voices), a bunch of "geeks", a "vocal minority" -- translation, whining bunch of losers.

You ruined a show to which we were loyal, ignored us when we protested in small numbers, insulted us when our ranks increased, and now, NOW, you expect us to watch what you've turned this show into?

Yep, I'm gloating. Not at the show -- it saddens me to see what it has become. Not at the remaining actors, who have to somehow salvage the crap you give them and try to distill it into a show they, and we, can stomach. No, I'm gloating at your stupidity. Some religions say, "You reap what you sow" -- my religion has something called the Law of Three -- "what you send out, for good or ill, returns to thee threefold."

You have been colossally, monumentally, stupid. Not ignorant -- we've been telling you what would happen -- willfully and deliberately turning a blind eye and a deaf ear to what's right in front of you isn't ignorance. It's stupidity. And now the consequences of your actions are coming back to you, and I think it's kinda funny. The Two-By-Four of the Goddess is like that, sometimes.

I'm also gloating on behalf of Michael Shanks. Perhaps you thought he'd be unable to find work and would have to come begging back to you on hands and knees for his job back. Perhaps you thought you'd be able to put him in his place and make an example of actors who get too uppity, who dare to try and dictate the creative direction of a show, who dare to put their personal integrity ahead of their paychecks.

Perhaps you were looking forward to watching him whore himself, getting a paycheck at the cost of his dignity, so you could tell him not to be so naive.

From the look of things in recent months, though, Mr. Shanks hasn't had a problem finding arenas in which to display his considerable talents. Sorry. He won't be whoring himself for you, or anyone else, any time in the near future; he doesn't have to. His dignity and artistic integrity are part of the package.

You were wrong, about so many things. We tried to tell you that you were making mistakes, and you refused to listen. I personally decided to let go, step back, and watch you make your own mistakes to see if you would learn from them. Not only have you *not* learned, you dared to tell me I was the foolish one for refusing to play along with your version of events.

Now the consequences have come around to bite you on the butt, and the look of surprise on your faces, the scrambling revision of your (abysmal) public relations front, the frantic "nothing wrong HERE" smiles... well, they're pretty darn funny. Better than most of the crap you've been trying to peddle to us via Sci-Fi, anyway.

When you get your heads on straight and start to produce a quality series, with quality actors, characters, and writing, I'll be right beside you cheering you on. Until then I'm going to gloat, as promised.

Have a nice week.

Heather

Heather Bungard Janney <heather@lapa.net (go ahead, I have a delete button)>
Lafayette, IN, USA - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 11:48 AM

In reference to Wright and Coopers comments in the "Coming up, on SG-1" article:

1. How long are you going to try to sell the dead whale Jonass "if you watch him you'll like him" line to the fans?While a few may be able to tolerate him, it would not hurt the show at all if he disappeared.

2. As a fan I do not see the difficulty in writing scripts to bring Daniel back. I'm sure there are many talented writers who would be willing to help you with your lack of abilities in that area. You had no difficulty writing unbelievable and ridiculous ways of giving Jonass all kinds of superhuman powers and making him into a poor example of Daniel. I'm sure we can forgive you for suddenly under any circumstances allowing Daniel to Ascend and rejoin the team.

MJFOSTER <MJFOSTER_53@yahoo.com>
Sturgeon Bay, WI - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 9:11 AM

DANIEL JACKSON HAS ALWAYS HELP MAKE STARGATE SG-1 THE SHOW THAT IT IS. BOTH MY HUSBAND AND I WERE VERY DISAPPOINTED WHEN WE SAW THE PREVIEWS ABOUT HIM DYING - AND THEREFORE LEAVINGTHE SHOW. WE HAVE WATCHED THE SHOW FROM THE BEGINNING AND WE BOTH GET VERY IMPATIENT WAITING FOR THE NEW SEASON TO START WITH NEW SHOWS. HOWEVER WE STILL WATCH THE REPEATS EVERY CHANCE WE GET - ON 3 DIFFERENT SATELLITE STATIONS.

THE NEW GUY THEY BROUGHT IN IS OK AS A BACKUP - HE'S SMART ON SOME THINGS, BUT PART OF THE GREAT TEAMWORKS THAT WAS STARGATE SG-1 WAS COLONEL WHO IS STRONG AND SHOR-TEMPERED BUT VERY CARING ABOUT HIS TEAM, SAM WHO IS A WHIZ AT SCIENTIFIC STUFF, JACKSON WHO KNEW ABOUT ANCIENT LANGUAGES AND ALL THAT HELPED US UNDERSTAND OTHER CIVILIZATIONS AND THE GAOULD, AND TEILK WHO IS THE CALM, FORCEFUL ALIEN COMPANION. THESE 4 PEOPLE, ALONG THE GENERAL HAMMOND, ARE WHAT SG-1 HAS ALWAYS BEEN ABOUT, THEIR TEAMWORK AND CARING ABOUT EACH OTHER IS WHAT MAKES THE SHOW GREAT, ALONG WITH THE STORY LINES THEY PRESENT

PLEASE BRING DANIELS JACKSON BACK. WE ARE VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT THE NEW SHOWS WE HAVE SEEN AND MISS THE INTERACTION AND KNOWLEDGE THAT HE PROVIDED ON THE SHOW.

BECKIE SQUIRES <DANCINGJEANIE53@AOL.COM>
VAN WERT, OH/USA - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 8:50 AM

To TPTB The following question was asked on a discussion board. It was aimed at people who are not happy with the loss of Michael Shanks' Daniel from season 6.

You may be interested in my reply as I am a supporter of the show from the very beginning who now finds it impossible to watch. QUESTION

""""""how can it be that with a change of writers and leaving of 1 actor it just is totally sh ............i just dont see that , i just would like to see something positive ( i said this before ,this site has alot of negativity ,but even if there is a bit "hope" .....daniel coming back in abyss and prob. some appearances in the end of the season ,i still dont see anything positive here ) and i think that is just too bad """"""

RESPONSE :-

It isnt that it is all bad just because MS has left . The change in direction of the stories was way before that. What really really annoys me the most is that from the film, Daniel was always the central character in my mind with ONeill coming in second , and sg1 started off like that, with development of the stories mostly through Jack and Daniel or through the team working together.

Then in season 4 the new writers came in and they reinvented sg1 , introducing LOTS of new characters, who more often than not got killed off in that episode or soon after. Daniel did less and less, the friendship between Jack and Daniel took a nose dive , Sam seemed to have all the answers to everything ; the stories got less and less believable and more like action comic stuff. Not surprising as the background of our new writers is from comic books!!!

By season 5 Daniel was more often than not propping up a wall , usually standing behind Sam’s Dad and really Daniel might as well not have been there.

When I heard that MS was leaving I wasnt even slightly surprised and my husband’s response was that he wouldnt be at all surprised if Chris Judge wanted to go as well because both of them had very little to do and must be bored out of their minds most of the time.

SO why the negativity?

I’ve said it several times but I’ll spell it out for you. SG1 was the best scifi on TV when it was following the original premise of the film as it did in seasons 1-3, and bits of 4 and 5. When Michael Shanks expressed his discontent, they didnt listen and didnt value the enormous contribution he had made to making it a roaring success. I DONT believe that they didnt know, I think they didnt want to know. I have heard TOO many times the words " after all, RDA is our star"" The studio dont decide who is the star, the audience do that.

So he threatened to leave, they told him his character wasnt popular and showed him the door. He rightly or wrongly believed them . He discovered just how popular he was in the months afterwards and this was a big eye opener for him.

TPTB did everything they could to promote the new guy. They gave him more publicity in 2 months than MS got in 5 years. What they didnt do though was listen to what the fans were saying they wanted. If you dont believe me, read the now 14 pages of comments on the guestbook. This isnt just me talking.

They lost the heart and soul of the team and didnt seem to care. They said they had run out of ideas for Daniel but promptly wrote Jonas lines that should have been out of Daniel’s mouth, and Michael Shanks said all he wanted was more for his character to do!!

They wrote Daniel out in the most painful way , and introduced the new guy in the same episode with a character that precluded him from being allowed into SGC never mind joining sg1. Then Daniel wasnt dead so we couldnt object , but he wasnt mourned either. The little wisp of ’Daniel’ we got in Revelations has never been repeated - just a ploy to keep the fans happy and hoping.

They pushed Jonas down our throats by writing the most convoluted story to get him onto sg1 that I have ever seen . IN reality he wouldnt have been on the team for so many reasons and there were lots of characters that they already had who would.

SO I am negative because

1) I find season 6 stories have holes in the plot you could drive a bulldozer through.

2) They could have persuaded Michael Shanks to stay . 3)The new writers ruined the show for me in season 5 with their banal stories which even my 16 year old finds too stupid to watch . 4)Even though CN is trying so hard, his acting is at best wooden and compares poorly with MS. 5)None of the original cast appear to be comfortable and although life goes on , the bond that made them special is missing its heart - Daniel.

I think it is quite likely that we will see that spark again in Abyss, and for that I am grateful, but it was a very hard won battle to get even that. Brad Wright had from Sept 2001 to write the several episodes for MS that he is now promising and in January MS hadnt been offered anything or even approached.

Lastly I am negative because Brad Wright and Joe Mallozi in particular and Robert Cooper just recently ,have done their best to dismiss Michael Shanks and to insult those who supported him.

I no longer trust them , and that makes it very difficult for me to enjoy season 6. I have tried to watch it and have tried to have an open mind. I have found their insensitivity difficult to believe.

The signs are that MS might be in demand as the lifeline for the sinking ship - the latest comments are almost gushing. Will they go back to the original premise of a winning show? Personally I think a change of writers back to those employed in seasons 1-3 would be needed, but thats just my opinion.

carole

carole campbell <carolecampbell1@hotmail.com>
Leicester, UK - Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:00 PM

Michael Shanks is an integral part of Stargate SG1.. He brings a freshness and youthfullness to the series that would be lacking without his character. Surely a series with such a wide window of diversity can keep such an integral character alive. It just would not be the same without him. He has matured into an important character in the series and would be very much missed by all of Stargates dedicated fans as myself. We love all the characters on your wonderful show. Daniel is such an important part of the team. Thanks for your consideration, Bob Gilbert, A dedicated fan.

Bob Gilbert <bobgilbert_8447@msn.com>
Salem, MA, USA - Monday, July 8, 2002, 6:59 PM

HEY EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!

Tell me who is coming in. What they do etc.

Cause I'm still getting last season here and I have no idea whats going on!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Same as below <same as below>
same as below, same as below - Monday, July 8, 2002, 4:31 AM

Hey, I live in Aus, and no one told me Daniel had LEFT!!! Why wasn't I informed!!! I'm fucking pissed off. It's like July of 2002 and I didn't know.

MICHAEL DON'T LEAVE IT!!!!

YOUR THE CUTE GUY!!! NO ONE ELSE IS LIKE YOU!!!

Keep up apperances k? Cause, well, your lik the most loved character. Why do you want to go??

Oh, and any producer ppl, why don't you let Australia know what's going on cause we FUCKING love your show.

Bye, love u all. Aspecially Tanith, the Goa'uld.

Kate Stephenson <Nikki_M_Voldemort@hotmail.com>
Innisfail, QLD, australia - Monday, July 8, 2002, 4:29 AM

I thought it was a teaser when he left then after a few episodes it sunk in, what the hell are they doing to a show based on four characters that works! Was it money, did michael decide to leave for other interests? Either way the show will take a huge blow to its dynamic, and will never be the same for me. shame.

Ed.

ed polaski <egp3@mindspring.com>
evergreen pk, il - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 7:07 PM

Even though I believe Corin Nemic is a wonderful addition to the cast of Stargate SG-1, Michael Shanks' departure [for me] detracts from the show.

If Michael Shanks wishes to return, everything should be done to return him to the role of Dr. Daniel Jackson, full time.

Thank you.

Z. Coombs

Zuleika Coombs <cubanicana@att.net>
New York, NY - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 6:58 PM

First, I wish to qualify my opinion by stating a few facts. I have a mechanical engineering degree and shortly an MBA in IT and Finance. Therefore, I believe my academic training gives me a certain special point of view in a situation such as the one presented here. More importantly, I am an avid sci-fi fan for most of my years and have disappointingly watched the genre have its difficulties due to certain individuals in power. It is a shame that those wielding such force lack empathy and have no respect for those who are actively involved in a project. By this, I mean the truly important people involved in the show, namely actors, directors, writers, and fans. In an effort to make money, the people holding the checkbooks think they know what's best. On the contrary, I have seen case study after case study where those controlling the money have failed to listen to subordinates and consequently made situations worse. What the higher-ups involved in Stargate do not quite understand is that there is a certain panache and believability that Michael Shanks imbues to the main character team and its dynamic. I find it absolutely unbelievable that a character that started out as the knowledge-officer is now considered unimportant. This is especially so when considering that he still has the most extensive background of any character in Egyptian lore. If there is a reason Mr. Shanks should leave the show it is because he has been lured in by a character showing promise and been rewarded by story lines that fail to make him any more than a 2-D automaton. SG1 has a humorous commanding officer, a sympathetic but tough thinker, the off-world experienced muscle, and what should remain to be the dedicated, malleable knowledge-officer found in Mr. Shanks’ performance of Daniel Jackson...

L. Longo <lplongo@go.com>
Princeton, NJ - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 5:41 PM

We just got to see the episode of Daniel's death last week (July 02). I must say I was very disapointed to see my favourite caracter go. I was certain that they would not kill him off and find a way to heel him. After all, he is one of the lead roles in the show! The role of Daniel played by Michael Shanks has touched us and enriched the series with his knowledge and his strenght of mind. I could not imagine that the producers would let him go, how would they replace him!

Ever since the movie, the caracter of Daniel has been the one to keep us hooked to the series. We have grown to love and respect Michael Shanks as Daniel Jackson and I don't see anyone taking the place of Daniel in the SG-1 team.

I'm sad to say that the series will have a very new meaning for me now that Shanks is not part of the team. I'm really hoping for a surprise return. I think it's the only way the series will keep the success it has. I hope that the producers will regret their deceision to let Michael go without a fight. They should have taken a couple of minutes to think about the fans and the fact that we are the ones that make them rich by watching the show. Disregarding our feelings is not a good way to keep us happy. Anyone who takes a look at the number of sites about Micheal Shanks and Stargate should realise that we matter to them and keeping us happy is in their best interest. And letting Michael leave so easily is not keeping us happy.

For my part, it's certain that without Michael, the show might not have a future and it seems a lot of people are sharing my point of view.

Hoping to see Shanks return as Daniel, Annie

Annie <aoccor@hotmail.com>
Québec, Canada - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 5:32 PM

I've watched the character fade and fade over the last episodes and I'm amazed at the lack of vision behind it. The show works so well because of the interaction of the four different main characters and taking one out is going to be like the Fantastic Four but, hey, no stretchy man..! Rather than letting go one of the pillars of the show, perhaps they should listen to the fans, for once (after all, it is US the show is made for, istn't it?).

Bring Daniel back! And for pete's sake, write some good stuff for him too...

A. M. Armleder <Armleder@hotmail.com>
London, U.K. - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 3:08 PM

Dear Sir and Madam,

Ordinarily I would not bestir myself into writing about this topic, but I have decided to add my voice to the call for the return of the actor Michael Shanks to the series “Stargate SG-1”. I have followed this series through every episode since its inception. Mr. Shanks made the role of Dr. Daniel Jackson his own, in spite of the memorable performance of James Spader who originated the character in the film. His contribution to the series has helped to make Stargate SG-1 the enjoyable and much loved production it has become. I cannot believe that you would simply let this actor walk away like that! SHAME!

It is entirely your own fault for failing to develop the character of Daniel Jackson more. Shame on you for hiring Michael Shanks and using him in this sloppy manner. It is a travesty that he has been so casually discarded. Your treatment of Mr. Shanks does not help the reputation of your industry in any way, nor does it enhance your own personal reputations either.

I was hoping to see the characters of Jack O’Neil and Daniel Jackson continue to develop into a truly great bond of friendship and respect: the military world and the academic world. You had in your hands the premise for a truly original story line and you are letting it slip away.

Archaeology is a wonderful science and it was a stroke of genius from the creators of the film “Stargate” to have used it in the way in which they did. The Stargate is an archaeological find and its origins and use are in part an historical mystery waiting to be solved both on earth and “off world”. Where did you put your imaginations?

I am asking you to bring back Michael Shanks as a full member of the cast of Stargate SG-1. People are not some disposable commodity for your use and pleasure and neither is the loyalty of the fans.

Dominic J. Ganteaume, B.A.Law, MIN.
Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, West Indies - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 3:08 PM

It's not bad enough that TPTB think that the loyal fans of the original Stargate cannot tell a new improved show when they see it (maybe because we have not seen one yet) but now they seem to think we can't watch one show, turn it off for a second show, and then turn it back on for a third show. I have been known to be a multi-task person. However it's not a problem for me since I don't watch Farscape and only catch Dead Zone in passing. It's amazing to see the extreme they will go to in looking ridiculous rather than admit they made a mistake.

I must apologize if some of my comments are better suited for the Discussion Board, however I was unsure of the appropriate area for this type of comment!

I was pleased to see that Showtime ran a marathon of Stargate's 5th season yesterday. I skipped x-treme, Meridian,(just can't stand Jonass)and Revelation (no DJ, why bother). But the shows with the team were a pleasure to watch again.

MJFOSTER <MJFOSTER_53@yahoo.com>
Sturgeon Bay, WI - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 9:09 AM

Dear Sirs, I have been a die hard Stargate fan since the original movie. I have been a fan of Stargate SG-1 since it's inception and have purchased the entire first season on DVD.

I was disappointed to learn that Michael Shanks was being written out of the series in his role as Dr. Daniel Jackson. I do think from what I have been able to ascertain on the internet that he is still willing to continue the character in the series.

His interaction with Richard Anderson and the rest of the regular supporting cast was one of the main reasons I watched the series. Daniel Jackson is the perfect offset to O'Neal's character.

Please take whatever steps are necessary to return Dr Daniel Jackson as a mainstay leading character to the series.

Oh, and please make other seasons available for purchase via DVD. =)

Thanks for your consideration.

Sincerely, Todd Hickman Lumberton, Texas

PS I watch on both Showtime and on the SciFi channel.

Todd Hickman
Lumberton, Texas, USA - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 5:39 AM

To whom it may concern:

It hurt to see Daniel go, I feel he is a vital part of the show and the show will not be the same without him. Its a shame that Michael Shanks felt that Daniel was going to be reduced to a useless character. I feel that the writers are extraordinary and can make each character flourish in their own right and continue to make this show great. I need Michael back he humanized Daniel and made me love him. Please bring him back. I miss O'Neil's and Daniel's friendship and chemistry. Daniel's character made O'Neil likeable. I am finding it difficult to see Stargate on the Sci-fi channel without Daniel. I remember recording Stargate on showtime when I had to work and I would miss the show, now if I miss the show, I miss it. Nothing against the new character he can be integrated into the series I like him, but not at the expense of Daniel. I use to just subscribe to HBO, but when Stargate came into the picture I made sure my cable packet included Showtime. Please reconsider the decision on Daniel Jackson. Talk and negotiate with Mr. Shanks. I miss him much. I find that I lose interest in a show that loses a main character, for example Farscape, Andromeda, and X-files just to name a few. Maybe one fan may not concern you, but I had to let you know how I felt. Thank you for your time.

Debbie Lascano
Bakersfield, CA, USA - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 3:50 AM

To Whom it May Concern:

My husband and I have continually followed Stargate the series since it first aired. We have watched on both cable and Fox. Thus, we are extremly dissapointed that you will be losing Daniel Jackson a.k.a. Michael Shanks. The whole series is supposed to be based upon the movie and therefore Daniel is a strong part of this series. If you remove this character, you lose a large part of what Stargate is about. Interaction and understanding of other cultures and species is what this show is based upon. Shanks' character revolves around bridging the gap between our world and other worlds. Without him the show lacks direction.

Please bring back the original concept of this show. We started watching the series because we enjoyed the movie. However, our enjoyment in watching is beginning to wane as you change the direction in which the series is headed.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Michael & Angela Patterson
Humble, Texas, USA - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 3:48 AM

Please write Daniel back in - we will miss him dreadfully. He was vital to the whole project in the beginning - so what has changed? Surely the team are still off exploring strange new lands where his unique communication skills are needed.

Susan McInnes
Dunoon, Scotland - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 3:46 AM

To Whom It May Concern,

I wanted to express my desire for you to consider the role of Daniel Jackson, as played by Michael Shanks, in the series Stargate SG-1. Principally, I wanted you to know that I am a fan of this show and have been since day one. As a matter of fact, I ordered premium cable service, Showtime, in order to see this show.

The cast of Stargate SG-1 have grown over the years to the point that it is obvious they are a family. I could not believe it when Michael Shanks departed. I have watched season 6 thus far but the show feels aloof, as if its not planted.

Please consider bringing Michael Shanks back to the show permanently. I know the storyline will allow this. Bring back the spark that makes SG-1 function as a team and makes this show desireable to watch. There is very, very few science fiction shows on television worth my time and this is (was?) one of them.

With respect,

Chris Wills
Powder Springs, GA, USA - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 3:45 AM

Please bring Daniel back, the new guy is okay but we really need to have Daniel back. Thank-you

janise <janisem@msn.com>
riverside , ca - Sunday, July 7, 2002, 1:04 AM

the show is not the same with out daniel and he can not be replaced bring him back to stay or i ma lose interest daniel add's a big part to the show hes the man i would like to be so pay him what he whonts ok thank's john king.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

john d king jr <nightrider3001@hotmail.com>
branson, mo. - Sunday, July 14, 2002, 8:29 PM

Our Family has been watching Stargate SG-1 WITHOUT FAIL every single Friday Night. We MISS DANIEL!!!!!!! Isn't there some way that he can be brought back, PLEASE????????? What if we get together a petition?????? I KNOW we can get thousands of names to bring him back. We like Jonas, but HE IS NOT DANIEL!!!!!!! Jonas could be Daniel's Assistant or something............... This show is one of the GREATEST TELEVISION SHOWS ON THE AIR!!!!!!!!!!

THANK YOU FOR STARGATE SG-1 FROM THE COBURN FAMILY!!!!!!!

The Coburn Family <Patricia@Coburn.net>
USA - Monday, July 8, 2002, 12:08 AM

Stargate SG-1 and its characters are the property of Stargate (II) Productions, SCI FI Channel, Showtime/Viacom, MGM/UA, Double Secret Productions, and Gekko Productions. All blog entries represent the opinion of the poster. All editorials represent the opinion of the author. All linked content represents the opinion of the linked site's webmaster. Copyright on all articles/editorials/blog entries belongs to the original author. Offer void where prohibited. Please remain seated while the aircraft is in motion. Warning: Coffee will be hot. A moose once bit my sister.