
???????????????????????????? <??????????????????????????????????????????>
?????????????????????, ???????????????? - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 5:17 PM
Corporal Vagabond <SpeciminX@aol.com>
WALES - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 4:52 PM
I'm writing from Switzerland (Europe) to save our Daniel... so excuse me if I don't speak English very well...
I like "Stargate SG-1" since a long time and Daniel was always my favorite character. He's very intelligent (he's a genious!) but he doesn't want to misuse his talent: he's modest, generous and especially wise.
Daniel's the head and the heart of SG-1. Without him, O'Neill would always take bad decisions, like violent actions with weapons. Daniel is better: he negociates and understands the different people. He's a translator, a messenger. Without him, Sam would always considerate the scientifical aspect of the situation: Daniel knows that other powers can act. Without him, Teal'c would never open his mind. And without him, Hammond would obey to the bad orders of the government and do bad things.
Daniel is a part of the team! It's an heresy to leave him! SG-1 will be like cut down! And why? ...simply because people find Daniel Jackson too "intellectual". Fortunately, he's intelligent and has a lot of knowledges to share! If not, "Stargate SG-1" will be a stupid science-fiction serie like lots of others...
Ankhsenamon Mérit-Maât: "Please, save our Daniel!!!"
Ankhsenamon Mérit-Maât
Switzerland - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 12:35 PM
greez
daniel.roxx
Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 8:33 AM
Sci-fi fans willingly suspend their disbelief - it goes with the territory. For instance to power a wormhole the diameter of a pin-head would take a mass the size of Jupiter. We happily overlook that, otherwise there would be no programme. BUT, it is therefore incumbent on the writers to keep the strain on that suspension of disbelief to an absolute minimum.
The science, they can't do much about, but human reactions and relationships *are* within their control, so it's an insult to the intelligence to expect the fans to believe that the Pentagon would agree to S.G.C.'s employing in their foremost team, a guy who - by taking militarily sensitive material from his own country to a superior power which might, for all he knows, turn it against his own world - has already proved himself to be a Threat to National Security. Why should they believe he would be more loyal to an alien power? Even if it is the good old U.S. of A....
That alone, regardless of Quinn's trying to blame Jack's best friend for sabotage after he'd saved Quinn's life, renders his position in S.G.-1 a total non-starter.
And as for his colluding in letting Daniel take the fall, how could any true friend of Daniel's *ever* speak to him again - other than to say, "Get out of my sight and never darken my door again", that is?
As for what this has done to The Team, it's like taking a Chippendale table, sawing off one leg and replacing it with a short length of two-by-two. It is now neither beautiful nor stable enough to be functional.
By the end of Series 3, 'Stargate S.G.-1' was a family-friendly programme that was compulsive viewing. It wasn't broke, but someone just *had* to fix it...!
Best wishes, Sue, the Disheartened and Disillusioned. 8-((( --
Sue Mitchell <sue@imps.demon.co.uk>
Waltham (village), U.K. - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 7:11 AM
Amanda Stark <amandastark@comcast.net>
New Hope, PA - Monday, August 26, 2002, 10:07 PM
JORGE STAMBUK <stambukal@hotmail.com>
SANTIAGO, Monday, August 26, 2002, 6:46 PM
CHRISTINE FOSTER <fosterc56@aol.com>
scunthorpe, N.Lincs - Monday, August 26, 2002, 5:45 AM
Read about 'abyss', and..uh... well, of course... there's always the 'thing' about the movie, right?... wonder if it's possible to have D.J. back? ahhh... for crying out loud!... we need him to get all those thingamajigs worked out! (ok... that would be 'artifacts', right?)
I have just checked out the cartouche-crusade-stuff... may as well give it a shoot! Oh! please, please, please, take-him-back...now, would ya?
Recordar: "muchas son las sendas... algunas se cruzan nuevamente"...
Futura Black <futura_black@hotmail.com>
valencia, venezuela - Monday, August 26, 2002, 1:12 AM
ALBERT ZAPATA <AZAPATA754@AOL.COM>
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 11:44 PM
Jodi Chapman <kitha22@hotmail.com>
tulsa, ok - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 11:07 PM
Peter Martinez <Orical@Engineer.com>
Miami, FL/ USA - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 7:05 PM
Monica Kolb <mbkolb@niagara.com>
St. Catharines, ON, CANADA - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 5:41 PM
En definitiva, el equipo de la serie deberia haberse planteado el viejo metodo anticonceptivo de la marcha atras hace unos meses, porque quizas, cada semana que pasa, sea demasiado tarde y los fans den a luz muy pronto unos indices de audiencia penosos.
De todas formas, calma y tranquilidad, de acuerdo?
Vimes, sedatio et tranquilitas
Alberto Melcon de la Rubia <vimes@wanadoo.es>
Barcelona, Sunday, August 25, 2002, 4:57 PM
lukitas <lukitasdoc@yahoo.es>
barcelona , spain - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 2:52 PM
TINA MARIE COSCO <SKATR72857>
FAIRMONT , WEST VIRGINIA - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 2:19 PM
Dave Browne <manic_idiot@yahoo.co.uk>
Essex, UK - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 12:43 PM
I heard recently that Michael Shanks, the actor who plays Daniel Jackson, will not be playing that role anymore on a show by show basis. I just want to say that that actor and character are essential part of the show and the show will not be worth watching without that actor/character. What's cool about the show is how it combines both history and space/futurism. The Daniel Jackson character played by Michael Shanks performed that function in a way that made the show very interesting to watch. His character is one of the most interesting ones because it allows stories to develop themes that are interesting to watch because they involve history. The show will be much less worth watching without him. Please return him to the show.
stefan <finniz@hotmail.com>
livermore, ca - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 4:47 AM
Zu den es angehen kann
Daniel Jackson ist eine wichtigen Vermögenswerte zu stargate SG1, während er ist das klügere wenn es zu Rennen in der Mannschaft damit daher er würde gebraucht werden kommt, mehr Geschichten zu schaffen, erzählt zu werden
Vielen Dank
mitchal heazon
mitchel heazon <game_guru69@hotmail.com>
personal, personal - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 4:25 AM
Ruth Jackson <rue_j@hotmail.com>
Fenton, MO - Sunday, August 25, 2002, 12:19 AM
PLEASE, FROM ARGENTINA, WE WANT HIM BACK.
VERÓNICA.
Verónica Luciana <lucylav@hotmail.com>
Mendoza - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 11:25 PM
Dear Sir I have Just finished watching the episode in which Daniel Jackson dies. (MGM in Spaninsh - August 24th) From MY point of view the character is fundamental to the series. He is the one who discovered how the Stargate worked in the first place. He is the one who works out communication problems with each new culture they meet. He is the one who break every ancient language they unearth. For ME, SG-1 team is perfectly well balanced as it is. Each member is well diferenciated from the others. If you want something different bring a new team member in but DO NOT erase one of them in such a lousy way (even if Daniel's death was a valiant one, it seems to me that it was loosely thought, as if you didn't think to kill him at the beginning of the season). The SG-1 Team as it was is one of the stongest and best developed characters SF series ever had, even better than Star Trek or Babylon-5. You still have time to correct it. Sincerely BRUNO JOSÉ VARANI
Bruno José Varani <brunovarani@hotmail.com>
Martinez, Buenos Aires - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 8:00 PM
About a year ago a SG-1 fan turned me on to the show. She did so by sending me several seasons of taped shows. After the first few episodes I was hooked. I became very comfortable with Daniel, Jack, Sam and Teal'c as a team. To me it was evident that they cared about each other, and the team began to feel like a family to me. I loved seeing them together, and the blending of different personalities, and gifts and abilities. Perfect.
I have not caught up with the current seasons, and am dependant on my friend to send me the reruns. One of the things I've considered doing is getting additional cable services so I can see SG-1 current run. But I have to tell you, knowing Daniel's character is missing, gives me a sinking feeling, and it can't possibly be the same without him and the contribution his particular personality brought to the team/family.
It's encouraging to think he might return, and I certainly would want that to happen, and hope it does. I don't believe the show will be as successful without Daniel. To me it's the beginning of death for the show. No one can fill Daniel's place. I know I can't be as excited about seeing the upcoming episodes, knowing Daniel is not a part of SG-1.
Please do whatever is necessary to bring back the family and dream team.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Brenda Andrews
Brenda Andrews <BrendaAndrews@Excite.com>
Virginia Beach, Virginia - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 7:38 PM
My purpose of this letter is question the decision of eliminating "Daniel Jackson" from Star Gate! He's a great charachter for the show. My wife doesn't really care for Jonas and wishes Daniel was back. I like Jonas, yes, but I'd love to see Daniel make a full comeback to the series. I don't know who was ultimately responsible for the decision to let him go but they obviously made a huge mistake! I hope this letter gets to somebody and is read and thought about and not just swept under the rug. I belive many fans like me and my family hope you do the right thing and bring him back regardless of what it takes to make it correct. The writers and producers of the show are fandamntastic, I don't think it would be hard to bring him back, even if it seemed cheesey, I'd still gobble it up, and be giddy to see him back! Please listen to the fans, were the ones who ultimatley decide if the show makes it or breaks it. Too many times were the ones who suffer because of stupid decisions made from higher up! (example: baseball) Please give us what we want, a geeky guy who we have come to love and enjoy and no substitute will do!
Thanx!
Matt Adams
Matt Adams <matt_sparky@yahoo.com>
Layton, Ut. - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 7:00 PM
My purpose of this letter is question the decision of eliminating "Daniel Jackson" from Star Gate! He's a great charachter for the show. My wife doesn't really care for Jonas and wishes Daniel was back. I like Jonas, yes, but I'd love to see Daniel make a full comeback to the series. I don't know who was ultimately responsible for the decision to let him go but they obviously made a huge mistake! I hope this letter gets to somebody and is read and thought about and not just swept under the rug. I belive many fans like me and my family hope you do the right thing and bring him back regardless of what it takes to make it correct. The writers and producers of the show are fandamntastic, I don't think it would be hard to bring him back, even if it seemed cheesey, I'd still gobble it up, and be giddy to see him back! Please listen to the fans, were the ones who ultimatley decide if the show makes it or breaks it. Too many times were the ones who suffer because of stupid decisions made from higher up! (example: baseball) Please give us what we want, a geeky guy who we have come to love and enjoy and no substitute will do!
Thanx!
Matt Adams
Matt Adams <matt_sparky@yahoo.com>
Layton, Ut. - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 6:58 PM
SOLO DANIEL JACKSON HIZO POSIBLE QUE SOPORTARAMOS, MUCHAS VECES, LOS ARRANQUES IMPERIALISTAS DEL CORONEL O'NEIL. DANIEL ERA LA IMAGEN DE LA TOLERANCIA, DE LOS PACIFISTAS LUCHANDO POR UN MUNDO MEJOR, DE LA RAZON Y LA IMAGINACIÓN POR ENCIMA DE LA FUERZA.
CÓMO PODREMOS VIVIR EN UN MUNDO SIN DANIEL? NO VEO COMO. CREO QUE LA SERIE HA PERDIDO SU MAS IMPORTANTE PERSONAJE, SU VERDADERO PROTAGONISTA Y EL ÚNICO QUE JUSTIFICABA QUE LA LLAMARAMOS DE CIENCIA FICCIÓN Y NO FUERA SOLAMENTE OTRA DE ESAS TANTAS SERIES DE ACCIÓN Y VIOLENCIA QUE INUNDAN LA TELEVISIÓN.
ESPERO QUE DANIEL REGRESE ALGÚN DIA DE FORMA PERMANENTE, PERO MIENTRAS TANTO, LOS FANS DE SG1 EN AMERICA LATINA, MANTENDREMOS NUESTRAS PANTALLAS APAGADAS. NO QUEREMOS UN SG1 SIN DANIEL JACKSON.
GRACIAS POR LOS AÑOS DE SG1 QUE NOS DIERON Y DE LOS BUENOS RATOS DE ENTRETENIMIENTO... HASTA PRONTO
RUTHM
Ruth Díaz <rumadi2000@yahoo.com>
Bucaramanga, Saturday, August 24, 2002, 6:40 PM
Marion and Andrew <marion@centurytel.net>
Sheffield Lake, Ohio - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 6:12 PM
Lee Jane
Lee Jane Hawkes <lee-paulhawkes@t-online.de>
Nr. Munich, Bavaria - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 2:52 PM
THis is to express my concern and disappointment over the departure of Daniel Jackson (Michael Shanks) from Stargate SG1. Daniel is an essential character to the story. While Jonas is ok....we miss Daniel very much. It's just not the same. You have taken a crucial element from the SG1 team away. The chemistry with the actors and their relationships on screen are the story! You remove any one of them and you leave a huge hole that cannot be filled.
Please bring Michael Shanks back as Daniel and give him more air time. What is the problem with that? You may not care about him, but we the fans...the ones who watch the show do. Needless to say, I will not watch anymore new episodes until Michael Shanks is returned as Daniel.
Respectfully; Jody Fraser
Jody A. Fraser <JodyUSMC5@aol.com>
Orlando, FL - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 2:01 PM
It's different when you know what happen in abyss. But I'm still very dissapointed with them.
lukitas <lukitasdoc@yahoo.es>
barcelona, spain - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 4:21 AM
Brenda Lempe <brenda.bean2@verizon.net>
Lynnwood, Washington - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 2:46 AM
Eran <cristalhart7@hotmail.com>
Mesa, AZ - Saturday, August 24, 2002, 12:25 AM
Sheila Williams <sheila_ann77@excite.com>
London, Ky - Friday, August 23, 2002, 11:57 PM
With the absence of Daniel Jackson of SG-1, the show has lost a must needed creative insight of the show. The character brings forth deeper insight into the story line of particuler situation of each episode.
Simply, bring the character back.
The decay of SG-1 is noticeable. By adding Daniel Jackson into the show, it restores the full dynamics that MGM worked so hard to establish in the first 3 years. Thus the creative presence will be reached to full potential. This will enable MGM to further the presence of SG-1.
Sincerely,
Scott Kilpatrick Stargate Fan
Scott Kilpatrick <pskilpatrick@msn.com>
Conifer, CO - Friday, August 23, 2002, 10:36 PM
"neith" <frost-orchid@altavista.net>
sydeny, australia - Friday, August 23, 2002, 9:15 PM
Randy Maxfield 2nd <rama@greatlakes.net>
Lexington, MI USA - Friday, August 23, 2002, 8:41 PM
I think everybody at your network are all idiots. Daniel Jackson was the best person on the stupid show. That was the only reason I started wathching it in the first place. I thought the way Daniel and O'neil interacted on the show was the best. My fayorite episode is Season 1, Volume 5, Episode 24, There But For The Grace Of God. If you don't remenber which episode that is it is the one were Daniel is transported to an alternate reality on Earth were the Gou'ld have taken over.
BRING BACK DANIEL JACJSON PLEASE
Sinceraly,
Amanda Nugent
P.S. For for the misspelled words if there are any
Amanda Nugent <mcn007@hotmail.com>
Jupiter, Florida - Friday, August 23, 2002, 6:00 PM
Deb Simcho <dsimcho@oppd.com>
Omaha, Nebraska - Friday, August 23, 2002, 4:44 PM
One of your greatest Fans,Jane Smith.
Jane Smith <none>
St Catharines, Ont - Friday, August 23, 2002, 2:26 PM
Miss Alison Marie Hodges
Alison Marie Hodges <bedazzled@e-garfield.com>
Cooranbong, N.S.W - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 11:10 PM
If Michael Shanks is upset about not being able to play Daniel Jackson anymore, then dont you think it is a bit unfiar not letting him do so. Im sure he relises the significance and power his character has over many people. This may seem strange to you but alot of people out there take stargate alot more seriously than just a television show,. there are conventions , clubs, gatherings all dedicated to stargate. Do you just want to ruin what some people take so seriously and hold so close to their hearts?
Please do not ruin what a fabulous creation stargate has become over the past years.
yours sincerly J.C
jessica C. <jess_ac88@hotmail.com>
sydney, nsw - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 9:14 PM
DO NOT delete Daniel !!!!!!
Hey, Michael - are you checking in ?
The world needs you.. so much
as role model.
I am a scientist - a disease ecologist
and also a primary school teacher.
please - we need you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My boys need you, especially !!
Please Help us !!!!!!
Best regards,
Dr. Karen McRoberts FGAA BSc Biol Hons Grad Dip Ed PhD Vet Biol.
Dr. Karen McRoberts <milliyan@optusnet.com.au>
thornlie, western australia - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 10:19 AM
lisa west <lisandra17@yahoo.com>
Tallinn, Estonia - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 9:02 AM
It is with great regret that I find myself putting pen to paper and airing my views on what is probably the greatest mistake made by MGM. I refer, of course, on the departure of Michael Shanks as Dr. Daniel Jackson, from the show Stargate SG-1.
It is somewhat hard to believe that in the beginning of this new century, mankind is yet to re-discover his humanity. In a place where success is measured by the number of viewers, revenue generated and the popularity of the show, to allow one of the major characters to depart without any effort to retain their asset, does not make sense to the logical mind. Where has our sense of compassion vanished to, for which mankind has portrayed himslef in numerous shows? Where has the sense of profit making disappeared to that is so obviously the only factor driving Tinstle Town?
To allow Michael Shanks leave the Stargate SG-1 series is an unsound decision, both financially and emotionally.
We, in the United Kingdom, are deeply depressed on hearing the circumstances in which Michael Shanks, as a last resort, resigned from the show. To find out that he was thought of as diposable, unwanted and inconsequential has left us dazed, dumbfound and debilitated. To try to comprehend why no one tried to stop him boggles the mind.
Michael Shanks has played a vital role on the show as member of the SG-1 team. He did not play a minor role and without his character the show would not be where it is today.
The first three episodes vibrant, thrilling, envigorating and refreshing; one could go on for an eternity using adjectives to describe the show. Dr. Jackson introduced a human element on discovering the universe and stating 'We come in peace,' as opposed to the military mind of entering a new civilsation fully armed to the teeth in preparation for an all out war.
Upon watching the series throught the years, it was apparent that Michael Shanks's character was being given less and less importance. I understand that all major characters have to be given time to explore, as long as the explorations are equally divided and not at the expense of one character, as it seems to be in this case. This demonstrates how Michael Shanks was thought of by the production staff. It is a shame to see this as Michael Shanks is a reputable actor and it is always an honour to watch him as he gives completely 100% to his role.
I understand that he has shown an interest in rejoining the series and to be a part of the second feature film, though only if the character of Dr. Jackson was given the opprtunity to be himself again. It would be wise to ask him to return as his absence would have a colossal effect on the revenue of the show. Word of mouth is the best and worst form of advertisement. With our hearts full of sorrow, we are completely appalled at the method in which this whole fiasco has taken place. If, for instance, a customer is not happy with the goods bought, not only will he not purchase any further products from the company, but he would also write and complain to them and inform other friends, colleagues and acquaintences; which, in turn, would cause the sales of the company to follow a path of exponential decay.
No doubt, you would have received thousands of letters similar to mine, urging you to ensure that Michael Shanks makes a full and complete return to Stargate SG-1. Please do not ignore them. This level of feed back informs you the how vital a role Michael Shanks played on the show. If not for the viewers than re-instate him for monetary reasons, as I assure you, you would see a rapid decline in the number of viewers and that would have a mammoth effect on the sales.
Yours faithfully
Mohammed Alavi
Mohammed Alavi <m.alavi@virgin.net>
Birmingham, N/A - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 6:42 AM
alicia a <earroab@latinmail.com>
pamplona, spain - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 6:12 AM
Karen Carlson <apetfairy@hotmail.com>
Ocean Shores, Washington - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 3:44 AM
As an Australian, I have not yet had the misfortune of seeing Stargate without Daniel. However, just seeing the photographs of his ascension made me want to cry. For those who have not been on the stargate website (www.stargate-sg1.com), there are many fans there from all over the world who want Daniel/Michael back. The show will not be the same without him. Jonas Quinn . . . who is he? He doesn't have the same depth of character, the same fan-following, the same personality as Daniel Jackson.
To all of the producers/writers out there, don't be silly. Bring him back. Here's a point to consider - how are the ratings?? Those pre-Ascension and post-Ascension? How could you kill off one of the greatest (and cutest) people in the show?
Hey, if he isn't brought back soon, there's probably going to be quite a few fans out there who will quit watching the show . . . particularly if "Jack" (Richard Dean Anderson) also leaves.
Maree van Doorn <Maree.Vandoorn@jcu.edu.au>
Townsville, Qld/Australia - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 12:35 AM
Christy <krystiv@msn.com>
sarasota, Fl/usa - Thursday, August 22, 2002, 12:02 AM
Sincerely Ronald F Wackenthaler
Ronald F Wackenthaler <Thunderrwolff@hotmail.com>
GolF Manor, Ohio - Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 11:36 PM
Idea for movie SG-1 decide that they need Daniel back so they go to the alien planet that brought them back to life before. They find Daniel's body (or use the energy squid) to bring Daniel back. He comes back to life and rejoins SG-1. Jonas moves to a new SG team or has to go back to his home planet for some reason. Daniel and O'Niell think back to the first episode. They remeber Skaa'ra and Sha're. O'Niell states that they should find them and reverse the Go'uld process they've done that to most of SG-1 before, so why not to Skaa'ra and Sha're?)
If you went with that idea then the Daniel Jackson fans would be incrediably happy and you won't get bugged by them anymore
Taryn Cherry <Spikeysp2@aol.com>
Huntingdon Valley, PA - Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 10:36 PM
Laura Papa <lpapa329411@hotmail.com>
Ilion, New York - Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 7:12 PM
Hi to all the fans of stargate in the world !
I miss Daniel Jackson. For me, he is the handsome and smart guy, with a crucial role of humanist in the story. No need to explain why ! All the fans know why ! He has a soul and a heart that are the caracteristics of Humanity. What is the future of sg1 without him ? Il est indispensable !!!! Please, and in french : R E N D E Z L E N O U S !!
With all the belgian Hope of convincing the MGM
Ingrid
Ingrid <Ingrid_espoir@yahoo.fr>
Liège, Belgium - Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 3:08 PM
Brenda Cogar <bcogarwv@aol.com>
Charleston , WV - Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 2:47 PM
brandon < www.sg1@homw.com >
mississaga, canada ont - Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 2:12 AM
Jim and Marilynn Tabor <rockets1jt@aol.com>
Colorado Springs, Colorado - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 11:55 PM
I think the fans deserve to see Daniel back on the show and a stronger storyline to boot. So please bring Daniel back so we his fans can begin to enjoy the show again.
Debbie Femrite <dfemrite@hotmail.com>
Hannibal, MO, USA - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 9:18 PM
ELSA REYNA <ELSACNE@HOTMAIL.COM>
PASCO, WASHINGTON - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 6:42 PM
Amaunet <amaunet_amon@yahoo.es>
Getafe, Madrid - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 2:36 PM
I have enjoyed immensely the role that the character Daniel Jackson brings to the series. He has always been an integral part of the synergy that has made StarGate SG-1 such a huge success.
I recommend you make every effort to bring back this key individual that, when combined with the other main characters, you will have a series that will be a hallmark series for Sci-Fi.
Bottom Line: Let's get Daniel back in the fight!
Dave Johnston <djohnston@cablemo.net>
Waynesville, MO - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 12:59 PM
Re:- Michael Shanks AKA Dr Daniel Jackson
I wish you to reinstate Machael Shanks to StargateSG1 as a permenant member of the team. His contributions were highly valued and contributed to the family like atmosphere of the series.
I feel that should he not be reinstated - the pleasure of watching the programme is halved.
Yours faithfully
Michael Tannock Age 17
Michael Tannock <stannock@yahoo.com>
Yateley, Hants - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 10:24 AM
Je suis une fan de la série Stargate SG1 et je trouve vraiment dommage que Daniel quitte la série alors qu'il en est le personnage principal, c'est lui qui découvre la porte des étoiles et l'équipe SG1 doit rester complète pour pouvoir continuer! Stargate nous apporte beaucoup de magie et de rêve, c'est une série fantastique, il faut que Daniel reste !!! Merci au nom des fans français !
Noëlla <ninou.com1@free.fr>
91260 Juvisy sur Orge, Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 5:43 AM
Gabriel Havington <PhantomGabriel@hotmail.com>
Obenton, La - Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 3:22 AM
Katie Winningham <winnie@triton.net>
Niles, Michigan - Monday, August 19, 2002, 5:31 PM
Lorris <halcyonknight@hotmail.com>
Southampton, England - Monday, August 19, 2002, 3:43 PM
I have been a loyal follower of this TV series, since the very beginning...which goes back to the motion picture "Stargate". I have watched the TV series at its beginning on the ShowTime Cable Network; and now followed it onto the SciFi TV Channel.
I am writing to all of you today as I wish to make my feelings known about what/how/why one of my favorite scfi shows is falling short of the high marks it once held for me. For one, you let one of the principal characters/actors leave; and in such a way that it really crushed me!! And since Daniel's character is gone, the show has lost its ensemble connection for me. All of the characters, that wonderful ensemble cast, made that show for me...and held it all together....NOW without this main character, the show has fallen....as well as the current storylines that are happening, now on the SciFi Channel, that too, has caused me to wonder if I can still be loyal, and want to watch this show anymore....as it just does not have the same Appeal for me...or draw to want to watch it!!! And for me to be saying this...is really hard, as I have loved this show, and all of the cast from its beginning....and now the show just does not have the same draw,appeal, zest, nor energy that it once drew me to want to watch it. Even if Michael Shanks character, Daniel, were still there, at present, the storylines that have been shown on the SciFi Channel...just do not do that show justice ...as to the previous seasons I have seen on the ShowTime Channel; where have the good writers of this show gone??
I do not wish to blast or blame any one of you today in this letter. But yet to state an opinion, and my feelings, from one loyal viewer and fan of this great show; in the hopes to show all of you that there is for sure something wrong and not quiet right with this show now. It is something that YOU need to address and correct, otherwise I will not have to decide whether to continue to watch Stargate SG-1 on the SciFi Channel, as it will no longer be on that Channel; as it will have been cancelled, and no longer in production. In that case ...I will just continue to watch it on the syndicated network in rerun form, and only up to season five. Mine is just a single voice and opinion here, but I know that there are others that feel as I do, and that perhaps have taken the time, effort, and put their thoughts down to you as well....In either case, you cannot ignore what WE, the followers and watchers of this show represent...as well as what our buying dollars do to keep this show, and others in production and going.
I hope that I have given YOU all something to think about, as well as something to set in motion to correct. This show deserves more than what it is producing at present. I wish to see the greatness return to it...as to why I am writing this letter to you today. In fact this is the first time that I have ever taken such a step before, in making my voice heard about a show that means so much to me...!!! I do thank all of you for your time and consideration over this matter with this show; and hope to get some kind of response back from you at a latter date.
With Sincere Regards,
Ron Glass Lake Charles, Louisiana USA
Ron Glass <trekerron@cox-internet.com>
Lake Charles, Louisiana - Monday, August 19, 2002, 3:30 PM
LEE <POWERS>
GLOBE, AZ - Monday, August 19, 2002, 2:54 PM
Please bring back the Daniel Jackson character to his rightful place in your hit show, Stargate SG-1.
Stargate SG-1 is the only reason why I subscribed to the Showtime network. It feels rather different without the Daniel Jackson character.
I wish you all much success in the near future and look forward to experiencing all the new shows with Daniel Jackson to come.
Thank you,
Enrique Gasca Los Angeles, CA
Enrique Gasca <enriquegasca@excite.com>
Los Angeles, CA - Monday, August 19, 2002, 1:50 PM
I'm also a big fan of Stargate SG-1 and of course of the character Daniel Jackson. Of course I want him back too and of course I'll support your campain; the first step would be writing this letter to you. Hopefully you'll succeed in bringing him back cause I, and my mother, won't watch the show in future if he's not in it.
Best wishes for succes,
Bettina.
Bettina Pavel <bettypapercut@yahoo.com>
Sibiu, Jud. Sibiu - Monday, August 19, 2002, 8:33 AM
It is my belief that the show will slowly die, it's popularity lessened following the removal of one of it's key original characters.
Karla
South Eastern NSW, Australia - Monday, August 19, 2002, 2:43 AM
Clip shows suck.
Thank you for your attention.
Therrethlofkee
Monday, August 19, 2002, 1:48 AM
Please reinstate Michael Shanks as Daniel Jackson!!!!!!!!!! He was my favorite character in the show and I miss watching him on it. If there is a Seventh Season and he is not in it- I will not watch it. So PLEASE BRING HIM BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joey Daniels <Joeysgwon@hotmail.com>
Marysville, Washington - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 11:08 PM
Please give Michael Shanks and the Daniel Jackson character a leading role if and when there is a Stargate movie. Also if there's going to be another season, he should return and have the same amount of screen time as do the others. He really is an intrinsic part of the team. Jonas Quinn just doesn't cut it.
Janet Hansen <veganlady@ultrasw.com>
Tucson, AZ - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 10:37 PM
John E Rollins Sr.
John Rollins <jrollins67@netzero.net>
Ashuelot, NH - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 10:19 PM
Julianna
Julianna <jvanadrichem@hotmail.com>
Ottawa, Ontario - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 9:14 PM
Richard G. Johnson <Rgjcaj@aol.com>
Paradise, CA - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 8:29 PM
MY FEELINGS ON THIS ISSUE ARE VERY SIMPLE. WITH DANIEL GONE SOMETHING IS MISSING. HE WAS THE SOUL OF THE SG1.
MYRA BRUMBERGER
MYRA BRUMBERGER <ShawnianAcres@aol.com>
WOODMERE, N.Y. - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 7:46 PM
Kimberly Camp <kcamp003@HOTMAL.COM>
Roswell, 30076 - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 6:22 PM
I'm just sayin' that I feel the show would benefit from Michael Shank's return!
Fritz Leipold <fritz@wittnet.com>
Newark, Delaware, USA - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 3:00 PM
george david stehlin <gdstehlin@hotmail.com>
albany, ca. - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 4:55 AM
Upon reading an interview it was hinted that there may be a 7th season that will have Daniel descending for some episodes but he won't be returning fully. I think that if there is a season 7, that Daniel Jackson should be included in it as much as possible. After all Michael Shanks has said that he would like to return to the show and the fans want him back.
I really hope that if there is a 7th season Daniel will descend and become a permanent member of SG-1 again. I miss Daniel and Jack's argumentive relationship and the way Daniel was always there when someone needed him. I hope that the makers of Stargate will do everything to get Michael Shanks to return as a main character....the way he should be.
I don't understand how they could just get rid of Daniel Jackson and replace him with Jonas Quinn, who is similar to Daniel in many ways...but he is not our Daniel. We want Daniel back in his rightful place in Stargate SG-1, we don't want a danny-clone! Return Michael Shanks and the much loved Daniel Jackson to SG-1. So that we can sit down and watch the TEAM including Daniel Jackson fight the goa'uld TOGETHER. Re-unite the team as one
Rose Matijevic <pirotess4@hotmail.com>
Sydney, New South Wales - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 4:25 AM
Sincerely BxNina8
Nina Matera <Bxnina8@aol.com>
Bronx, New York - Sunday, August 18, 2002, 1:11 AM
Thomas Mayberry <rangerboss@aol.com>
Hollywood, FL - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 11:56 PM
I just found out that Michael Shanks is not on stargate sg-1 anymore.I am sooooo mad because the only reason why I watched stargate was because of Michael's character (Daniel). I would like you to please consider putting him back.
Rosie
Rosie <sparkles121686@aol.com>
donna, tx. - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 2:48 PM
I really really like your show( Stargate-sg1),very very very much. There's not many Sci-Fri shows I like. I know that you are a very busy person,so I will get write to the point. The highlight of the show to me is Daniel Jackson. He makes the show.One show I wathched he was there for the first part, I freaked I thought, THIS IS IT STARGATE'S OVER! They took Daniel off the show. Them show up. Stargate-Sg1 will never be the same without him. PLEASE BRING DANIEL BACK!!!!!!!! Elizebeth Winters.
Elizebeth Winters <none>
St Catharines, Ontario - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 11:34 AM
Positive mails only to these addresses!
Mr. Michael G. Shanks c/o SFM 1122 S. Robertson Blvd, Suite 15 Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
Mr. Michael G. Shanks c/o Jay Schwartz 800 S. Robertson Blvd. Suite 2 Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
According to the site owner the first was faster and more reliable...tested Spring of this year. ~~~~~~~~~
carole campbell <carolecampbell1@hotmail.com>
Leicester, UK - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 9:42 AM
I am writing to ask that you please bring back Michael Shanks to the Stargate SG-1 show now playing on the SCI-FI channel line-up.
I have been a fan of the show for years, but this year it's missing the main element of the show....the character of Dr. Daniel Jackson. I've watched most of the episodes of season 6 so far and I have to let you know that truthfully the show now has a fatal flaw....it's missing it's most captivating element.....Michael Shanks' character. While I have loved watching this show for 5 years, I am now finding that I have no problems with switching the channel to something more interesting now....unthinkable thing to do during the first 5 years the show was run!! It's because Daniel Jackson isn't there! It's like watching the X-Files without Mulder! Now I don't mind missing a show or two or three. Without Michael Shanks' character, there's no pull to the show anymore! The other characters don't seem to interact correctly...they're not family. The characters are all there and acting normal, but they're not re-acting off Daniel Jackson.
I've tried to find the reason the show is boring now....and it's hard to pin-point. All I can say is that without Daniel Jackson, the other characters are just acquaintances....they're nice enough and you end up liking them just fine, but you don't have any angst over what they're feeling or going through. Daniel Jackson's character as portrayed by Michael Shanks strikes a chord in me that rings true. He can be a son, a lover, a best friend, and all that I want to be when I grow up! He is the Devil's Advocate, the small voice of conscience, the weakling in all of us, the lion's roar, the protector, the smartest person you know with the least common sense, the hurt little boy, and most importantly, the glue that holds the SG-1 family together! And he's been ripped away from the family and now the family isn't even a family anymore....it's a group of individuals that gather and go on adventures once a week...yawn. He was Hammond's prodigal son, Sam's sibling, Jack's confidante, Tealc's redeemer and so much more.
You can have the remaining characters bounce smart phrases and tears off each other all you want, but there is no character there that I can relate to like I did with the Daniel Jackson character that gives me the feeling that they are absorbing the comments or emotions and processing them and returning them back with a bang! That special chemistry is missing.
By the way....I'm not a teeny-bopper slobbering over the latest hunk. He's very cute and all, but there are cuter out there. I'm 42 years old and I miss my friend. That's what it feels like. I miss Daniel. There are enough TV shows out there that are like the current Stargate season. That's why we have so many channels to change. I miss the character of Daniel Jackson that was created in the movie and in the series. Please bring him back.
Please get Michael Shanks back if possible. I, for one, do miss him.
Thanks for reading.
Carol McKinnon <foxfiles@prodigy.net>
Lowell, Massachusetts - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 8:35 AM
Amanda Anderson <ajt100@supanet.com>
england - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 7:54 AM
Patricia <pmbird31@aol.com>
Bradford, USA - Saturday, August 17, 2002, 7:01 AM
daniel varricchio <oddball461@aol.com>
hendersonville , tn - Friday, August 16, 2002, 11:57 PM
JimDalzell <jbdalzell@msn.com>
Orange Park, FL - Friday, August 16, 2002, 11:13 PM
Here in Germany «Stargate SG-1» is late in it's 5th season officially. However, I managed to watch the first 7 episodes of 6th season so far using other means than the local tv station. To sum it up: I AM SAD! I'm upset for weeks now. You (the producers of the show) even made my cry. I don't like that.
First of all, I'm sad to see Michael Shanks leaving the show and with him my most favourite character. I'm stonedead certain, you will see a lot more of my fellow countrymen being cross with TPTB once «Meridian» has been aired in Germany for the first time in September 2002. Stargate is (or better: was) very popular over here - as it is in many areas of Western Europe actually. And why is that?
I somehow doubt it is because of the NID/conspiracy episodes or the war with the Goa'uld story arc and the ever increasing use of special effects. Nor was the introduction of gorgeous young ladies like the «Anise» character of any incentive to tune in. Don't get me wrong - my eyes were pleased but if I wanted to see pretty women I'd turn to other places; no offence intended. Just for the record: I'm an affluent young male and therefore well within the targeting group for the advertising industry.
In the beginning I watched the show because I liked the way how the producers/writers handled the transition from the movie to the new series. The Daniel Jackson character was the most likeable in the movie and soon I found myself enchanted with his portrayal by Michael Shanks. RDA was doing fine too but I must admit having had at first doubts about the Sam Carter character. However, these doubts vanished in season 3. Teal'c is a good and honest chap. I would trust him with my life but somehow he isn't going to make me watch the series.
Originally, I tuned in because I knew RDA and Don Davis (never heard or seen any of the other actors before). Furthermore I was intrigued by the show's approach. Using the Stargate to seek out new life and new civilisations in present day circumstances was an idea I was genuinely interested in. In Star Trek, Jean-Luc Picard was my favourite before he changed important parts of his personality with his appearance on the big screen.
I didn't mind, Stargate was US-centered despite its meaning for the whole planet although I wished TPTB would recognize one day the tens of millions of viewers in Europe. There was a charming and educated fellow in the show who spoke his mind when ethics, moral issues and sometimes even basic human rights were in danger of being sacrified for no convincing reason by the military or political leaders respectively.
With Daniel Jackson I could easily identify myself. Over time, when the exploration issue became less and less important I've drawn joy from the writers efforts to develop the four main characters. In over 100 episodes there is a good chance for writers to do so. And they did. SG-1 managed to become part of the family. Of all the possible interactions between the main characters I was most intrigued by the Jack/Daniel bantering.
For me there was nothing improper the way the writers handled the issue. On the contrary, the more militaristic and showmanshiplike the series became after «Small Victories», the more I appreciated the humour shown in the relationships between Jack and his teammates. That is what kept me watching. With Daniel Jackson gone the show has lost it's appeal to me.
When I first learned Mr Shanks was leaving the show I couldn't believe myself I was reacting so emotionally. I tried to calm myself down with the notion that most probably the actor has nothing in common with the character he is portraying. I still think that is utterly true. However, Michael Shanks triggered something and it isn't only because of his good looks. His acting helped a lot to get me growing fond of Daniel Jackson, in fact watching every scene with him in a state of high excitement. That doesn't happen very often with other actors. Other good looking hunks (e.g. Enterprises Ensign Mayweather or Stargates Jonas Quinn for that matter) stand no chance of achieving the same effect so it must be something else.
Perhaps it is the actor after all. I've read quite a number of reports concerning Michael Shanks appearances at conventions in Europe earlier this year. He seems a nice person.
I also read interviews with him as well as with TPTB. My conclusion is that I would probably have done the same as Michael Shanks. Leaving the show was the right thing to do for him. I wish him every luck in the world for his future career.
I would be most happy should he get a leading role in another successful tv series that will make its way to European small screens. Independend Canadian TV-films are not likely to fulfill this wish.
BTW, does anyone know how to contact Michael Shanks or his agent via mail?
Cheerio and Lots of Love
Tristan
PS: I hope it wasn't a ghastly thing to read through this letter. Imagine I would have written it in German. ;))
Tristan Hoffmann <t-ho@bigfoot.com>
Duesseldorf, Germany - Friday, August 16, 2002, 11:12 PM
Glenna Mitchener <gmitchener@sympatico.ca>
Oakville, Ontario - Friday, August 16, 2002, 8:28 PM
Martin Hauser <jmhauser99@aol.com>
Houston, Texas - Friday, August 16, 2002, 6:01 PM
Stephanie Reeves <lions@hypermax.net.au>
Brisbane, Australia - Friday, August 16, 2002, 9:07 AM
Stephanie Reeves <lions@hypermax.net.au>
brisbane, australia - Friday, August 16, 2002, 8:52 AM
I'm writing to ask that you reinstate Michael Shanks as Daniel Jackson in Stargate SG-1. He is an integral character who humanizes the other more militarized team members. Not having Daniel in the show detracts from the original premise that a sensitive archaeologist was necessary to provide a bridge to other cultures. If you want him to have a larger role, develop a romance between him and Samantha.
I am a 34 year old woman who first purchased Showtime cable in 1996 so that I could watch SG-1 since I loved the original movie. Please don't disappoint us loyal fans -- there's no reason that the SG-1 team can't have 5 members!
Thank you for your consideration,
Robin Erickson
Robin Erickson <AdairRobin@aol.com>
Chicago, IL - Friday, August 16, 2002, 5:20 PM
I was very upset to hear that Daniel Jackson was leaving Stargate so much that I haven't had the heart to watch the show since and I really an not sure that I will watch it unless he returns. I am not trying to be hostile or anything else but when I see something that make me really enjoy something and then that something is taken away I just won't enjoy the show anymore. Not to say that he makes the show but it takes all the team to make the show. Not just part of them. I just what i'm tring to say is with out Daniel it not worth me watching.
Thank you for you time.
Sincerely,
Patty Robinson
Patty Robinson <pwilroy_robinson@hotmail.com>
Hannibal, Missouri - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 8:07 PM
I am writing to express to you my feelings on the fazing out of the character, Daniel Jackson. I realize that you have other influencing factors in decisions such as these, but I also know that you want to give the viewers what they want most, afterall it all comes down to the ratings in the end. I would like to explain how I stumbled onto the show during it's second season. I have to admit I saw the original movie (starring Kurt Russell) and liked it a lot. My husband thought the movie was good, but nothing to scream about. However when he saw the season premiere of SG-1, he was entranced with it. He watched every episode he could catch. I started watching it with him and found it to be an amazing story that took a great imagination and attention to detail to merge history with science fiction. It intrigued me. I have watched ever since. My husband rents the season premiere movie several times each year, especially if there is going to be a SciFi marathon. In fact I intend on buying it for him for his birthday this year.
I think the character Daniel Jackson is one of the essential pieces that make this series work. I also believe that Michael Shanks was made for this part. I was not just upset when I saw the episode of his death, I was angry. Sgt. O'Neill and Daniel's relationship were part of what I loved about the show. They made me feel a large range of emotions, from laughter to tears. I must honestly say I catch the show here and there now but it is loosing its appeal to me. I remember a time when no plans could be made for Friday nights, that was pizza and Stargate night, but I suppose that won't effect anything much as my husband remains an avid fan of Sgt. O'Neill's. He has mentioned that O'Neill's comments were more effective with the manner in which Daniel would react to them.
I am glad to have had this opportunity to let you know our feelings on this matter. I must say I sincerely hope Daniel returns, it just isn't the same without him.
Sincerely, B.James
B. James <SphrBlue7@aol.com>
Bonifay, Florida - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 6:32 PM
There was once upon a time a hypothetical company called "Cinnamon Buns" that sold Cinnamon Buns with lots of cinnamon and yummy icing. One day, the company decided they weren't going to use any more icing because it's really not important anyway, it's just icing.
Some of the customers complained, saying that the icing was their favorite part and they weren't going to buy any more, at which point the owners and some of the other customers because a little hysterical and insisted that these people were bad customers who only liked icing and had never liked cinnamon buns at all, some even going as far as insisting that these people wanted to change the name of the store to "Icing Buns."
"Nope," the complaining customers said, "we love cinnamon buns, just not without icing, and we ain't buyin' them without icing."
While we're on the subject, we've also noticed a distinct lack of cinnamon in the recipe lately. The store IS called "Cinnamon Buns," isn't it? We don't care HOW much you like raisins.
Katherine <hungry-yet@metaphors-r-us.com>
Atlanta, GA - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 4:02 PM
Vicki Thornton <VickiThornton@msn.com>
Millbrook, Alabama - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 12:19 PM
Katie
Katie <KatieRack@aol.com>
Cary, IL - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 11:02 AM
PLEASE bring Michael back. We miss him!
Anne Lozano <anne@annelozano.com>
Eagan, MN - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 10:22 AM
Jan L <janmar@legal48.freeserve.co.uk>
London, England - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 8:35 AM
I find it difficult to comprehend that the producers of Stargate are prepared to let one of the original characters, upon whose very existance the whole basis of the show relies upon. To say why the character of Daniel Jackson is integral to the show is difficult because it's not just the character, it is the way he is portrayed on the screen. There really aren't that many character's on the show that one can relate to - Jack's an aggresive loner (and potential stalker), Sam's a gorgeous genius with no social life and Teal'c is an alien. Sort of limits who you can relate to. Daniel has been married, he's looked for and lost his love, he makes mistakes and admits them, yet has frequent moments of pure genius but doesn't rub it into his colleagues faces and is played by an actor who brings charm and integrity to his part.
To replace Daniel with another character will not work, whether the new character, regardless of his appearance (I understand he's supposed to be a "pretty boy"). If we were interested in a character's appearance, we'd be watching some soapie full of gorgeous men - not a science fiction program complete with aliens. After all, Dr Who was not exactly Mr Universe in any of his reincarnations, yet you would be hard put to find a more successful television program.
We, the viewing public love Daniel because he is a three dimensional character with strengths and weaknesses like any of us. He makes us laugh, he brings wry humour to the show, and I for one will miss him.
While you have the chance, please bring him back. Otherwise, goodbye Stargate - it was a good program while it lasted.
Tracy Harris <theharry@iinet.net.au>
Dianella, WA - Thursday, August 15, 2002, 8:05 AM
Irma Verastegui <iveraste@yobel.com.pe>
Lima, Lima - Saturday, August 31, 2002, 10:01 PM
Loviton Muriel <tommpouss@yahoo.fr>
Savigny Sur Orge, Saturday, August 31, 2002, 11:38 AM
Jan Lifton <janmar@legal48.freeserve.co.uk>
London, England - Saturday, August 31, 2002, 11:02 AM
Brenda Merkley <thumper7100@msn.com>
Reno, Nevada - Saturday, August 31, 2002, 4:36 AM
Vatra Codrin Stefan
Iasi, Romania - Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:47 AM
JENNIFER LOUISE BOTTRELL <jenniferbottrell.hotmail.com>
NAMBOUR, QUEENSLAND - Friday, August 30, 2002, 11:52 PM
S. Leinonen <smooth24@hotmail.com>
Helsinki, Finland - Saturday, August 31, 2002, 4:36 AM
Russ Eden <rance@wimmera.com.au>
Horsham, Vic/Australia - Friday, August 30, 2002, 4:28 PM
On Another Site, I just came across an old post of mine from April 2002. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't think you will see the original Quinn as presented in 'Meridian'.
After T.P.T.B. have had time to digest all the criticism about the appalling manner in which Laughing Boy was depicted, and have realized that they've dug themselves into a really deep dark pit from which there is no plausible escape, I'd put money on their quietly binning that personality and re-writing the whole character from scratch - probably borrowing from Dr. Jackson's c.v.
And I bet they think we won't notice the switch to the back-up personality...
Cynic? Moi? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I seem to have been proved correct...
Best wishes, Sue - returning to Fanficland where the plots and characterizations are better.
Sue Mitchell <sue@imps.demon.co.uk>
Waltham (village), England - Friday, August 30, 2002, 2:05 PM
What if the producers of MacGyver would have wanted to switch charaters with MacGyver and O'neil? D*I*S*A*S*T*E*R
Please, for me, and all the other SG-1 fans out there and last but not least yourself, bring Daniel Jackson back, otherwise SG-1 is doomed to become "Wormhole X-treme" Unless season 6 is the last season that is...
Many regards Karl Eklund, SWEDEN
Karl Eklund <karl@veetoo.net>
Stockholm, *** - Friday, August 30, 2002, 12:48 PM
Louise Cairns <louise@cairns192.fsnet.o.uk>
Cumbria, UK - Friday, August 30, 2002, 8:25 AM
angela tindall <tigerangeline@aol.com>
new hope, alabama - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 8:55 PM
Espero que su desaparición no sea permanente y que vuelva pronto a la serie. Y esta vez hasta el final de la misma. No suele gustar a la gente que los actores principales de las series desaparezcan. Ya que nos permiten, solo con los gestos, entender el argumento del momento.
Mari Carmen
Barcelona, Barcelona - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 3:19 PM
Ellen Vandover <danceswithhorses@cox.net>
El Cajon, CA - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 2:17 PM
Abyss showed exactly what's missing: DANIEL and the warmth and compassion he brings to the team. The scenes between Jack and Daniel were some of the best in Stargate, ever.
Take Daniel out of the equation and you have bland episodes. Put Daniel back and the fire returns to the show.
The first half of the season is now over. I sincerely hope you listen to the many fans who are urging you to return Daniel Jackson to the SG-1 team for the second half.
Scott Snyder <Snidelysco@yahoo.com>
Grand Rapids , MI - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 1:07 PM
I've watched Season Six up through "Shadow Play" and have to admit that I'm very disappointed. Jonas Quinn is not a very good character and as a replacement for Daniel Jackson, he falls way behind. The actor is not as talented as Shanks, either, and the huge difference between both characters and both actors was hugely apparent in "Abyss."
I hope you will think seriously about descending Daniel Jackson properly and putting him back with his team where he belongs. If this happens I will happily start watching the show again.
Suzette Peterson <SuzePat29@yahoo.com>
Goleta, CA - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 12:00 PM
Vicki Thornton <VickiThornton@msn.com>
Millbrook, AL - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 11:16 AM
I was extremely sad to hear the news that Michael Shanks was not to renew his contract at the end of season 5. At first I had thought like many actors he had decided to move on and extend his acting range through new roles and characters but was greatly disappointed to learn that this was only half the story. Like many fans who watch the show. The discovery of strange new worlds, it's culture, people and history has always been my first love for watching.Through Michaels character this and so much more was provided and since season 3 little or nothing has been written regarding the issue. I understand that after five years writers who have provided us with great episodes and scripts tend to try new angles and different formats but as the actual story stems from the discovery of different planets, the people and their history. I would have thought that it would have been an integral part of the continuing story. I do not wish to condemn the writers or the producers of the show as I truly believe that it is one of the greatest TV shows of our time. I only wish that before it is too late and people start to switch off that you discover why people actually switched onto the show and why they love it so much.
With best regards,
Alex.
Alex Irwin <alexirwin@europe.com>
Sydney, NSW - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 8:39 AM
erika jeromin <erikajeromin265@MSN.COM>
WARRAGAMBA, NSW - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 8:04 AM
Alex Irwin <alexirwin@europe.com>
Sydney, Australia - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 7:15 AM
Hannah Wilkinson <happy_hannah90@hotmail.com>
Lincoln, England - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 6:06 AM
Bryan Michaud <none>
Concord, CA - Thursday, August 29, 2002, 12:00 AM
Russ LaPeer <rlapeer@juno.com>
Ocala, Florida - Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 10:40 PM
It is a crying shame that Daniel Jackson is not in SG1 at the moment. How you can continue to make Season 6 without one of the two remaining origional characters from the movie is absolutely obsurd. Please let the writers and Micheal Shanks continue to develpoe the character and bring him back to the the SGC. How long can you keep going without buckling under the pressure from fans from around the world WITHOUT doing something.
Peter Mawby <tiiulk@hotmail.com>
Manchester, England - Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 10:49 AM
You cannot take out him, like this!!! Most of people need his appearance in the show, because he gives us the human's feels that the army don't give.
He is a human person in the show. He is a good and funny.......... I can't believe.. HE IS THE MAIN ACTOR IN THE SHOW!!!
DO YOU REMEMBER DE FIRST FILM IN THE BIG SCREEN???
PLEASE YOU MUST HE RETURN TO THE SHOW, IT IS NEEDS TO THE SHOW AND TO US TOO.
YOU CAN DO IT, YOU HAVE A GOOD IMAGINE TO MAKE IT, PLEASE DO IT.
Pere Pascual.
Pere Pascual <canpascual@menta.net>
Mataró, Barcelona - Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 5:19 AM
I am a fan of the Stargate SG-1 series. It all started when I saw the original Stargate movie, which I loved. One day channel surfing I found SG-1 on Saturday morning Fox TV. I was hooked!
Each of the characters contributed to the "gel" of the show. The relationship between wise-cracking Jack and Daniel has always been a highlight of the show. It has also been a pleasure to see each of the characters grow and become more three dimensional with each episode. To read interviews where an writer or a producer felt a character's "arc" was over is ridiculous! That's just lazy writing! Each of the characters has had love interests, one relationship does not define an entire character.
I have felt that in the prior year's season there was quite a bit of focus on one or two characters at the expense of the others. This helps to define those characters, which is fine. But then it is time to do the same for the other characters. I am afraid that if something is not done about this more of the original actors will depart the show. That would be a real shame!
I continue to watch Stargate SG-1 on any channel I can find it. I love the re-runs that have Daniel in them. I like the newer episodes too, because I couldn't do without a dose of Jack, Carter, and Teal'c. There has been something missing from the show this season. That is the character of Daniel Jackson.
Please review your story arc plans and find a way to bring Daniel back!
Sincerely, Laura Himmel
Laura Himmel <ldhimme@fresno.k12.ca.us>
Fresno, CA - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 6:57 PM
i consider myself a very big fan of the t.v serious "Stargate Sg-1" one of my favorite characters was Dr. Daniel Jackson played by Michael Shanks i think this character was a very important part of sg-1 his replacement characer "Jonas" will never be able to replace the oringal Dr. Jackson futhermore i think u should bring back Dr.Jackson the team wont be a team without him he was the glue
thank you Trinity A. Penndragon
Trinity A. Penndragon <Quicksilver89@msn.com>
Salem, Mass. - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 6:32 PM
Elaine Rochevot <n/a>
Norfolk, Va. - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 5:59 PM
thanx for the time, Cae Morgan
Spoondooloo <spoondooloo@hotmail.com>
bargoed, wales - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 5:57 PM
???????????????????????????? <??????????????????????????????????????????>
?????????????????????, ???????????????? - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 5:14 PM
Thank you for listening.
Vicki Thornton <VickiThornton@msn.com>
Deatsville, Alabama - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 12:40 PM
Jim Big Fan Jackson
Fort Worth, Texas - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 11:42 AM
catherine litchfield <moo_the_cow@hotmail.com>
swansea, west glamorgan - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 7:48 AM
SG-1 is great but they need Daniel. They need the Daniel as the foil of O'Niel. They need Daniel as the member of the family that is missing. Figure this out or you guys will lose in the long run.
You might be able to keep all of the fans through the shows run. But the extra money you desire to make from the fans of the show will evaporate if Daniel is not returned to the show. You figure it out and you ponder the economics of the matter.
David <dsed@aol.com>
Minnetonka, USA - Monday, August 26, 2002, 10:58 PM
I am writing to ask that you bring back Michael Shanks as the character of Dr. Daniel Jackson.
Producers and Executives are practical people. I like to think of myself as a practical person. It's not good business to throw out one of the original characters of a hit series, arguably the main character in the movie. The viewing public doesn't care if Michael Shanks is "difficult". His character is essential to the show.
The Stargate SG1 writers and actors have worked very hard to build a family on the show. To just "kill off" the character of Jackson leaves a hole that cannot be filled with the odd (are you an alien or not?) character played by Corin Nemic.
I came to the show a fan of Richard Dean Anderson. I adm