I have just seen Meridian and I will say that it was a very powerful episode, full of extraordinary acting and filming. My gratitude and thanks to the writer and director for making sure that Daniel made this transition with caring, support and appropriate respect due a character of his stature. That said, I must now tell you that I am grieving over the loss of Daniel, an irreplaceable member of SG1. I am grieving for the team that IS Stargate to me. I am grieving for the other characters who will have to go on without Daniel. I am grieving for all of the actors, Michael who had to leave to preserve Daniel’s character, and all the rest of the crew who will see the decline of this once wonderful show as we all call it a day here and now!
What I don’t understand is why time can be invested to develop a new character when time was denied to such a rich and already deeply established, well played, and much loved character who IS, along with Jack, the original Stargate team! We all know that Michael would return if that time would be devoted to Daniel. Why, when you know that all of us who support the show can’t bear to lose Daniel and the original team, do you feel it is appropriate to rip our hearts out and then expect us to shrug it off and be happy to continue to watch a fractured show that is a shadow of its original self.
It appears that the answers to my questions are made clear by the following statement made by Brad Wright in the April 2002 vol. of Scifi:
“First and foremost, Wright suggests. ‘The Sci Fi Channel is our new broadcaster, and we’ll have a whole lot of new viewers, so our new guy is going to provide an enthusiasm and a newness to the team that the new viewers deserve. Nobody wants to tune in to a show for the first time and see a bunch of characters going through the Stargate where every one of them is in ‘been there, seen that’ mode. I understand and respect our regular actors’ decisions to act that way because it makes sense. This is their job and they have been doing it for five years. However, the new guy will give a freshness. He will deliver a fresh approach to how we look at every situation.’ ”
Mr. Wright. Are you saying that you don’t care about the show’s loyal current viewers? Are you saying that the current characters are dull and need someone new to refresh them? Are you saying that we all feel so strongly and care about Daniel so deeply because he has a ‘been there, done that’ attitude toward the Stargate and is boring!
If you feel this way about your own show and about all of us loyal fans…..why should any of us care to spend our time giving it a chance in season 6. You just said you don’t need us and that it is not worth your time to give us the quality show and the characters that we love. I believe that it is your marketing strategy that needs some serious “refreshing” not the characters of Stargate SG1!
You have lost me and my family, if that means anything to you.
Signing off with a very sad and disappointed heart.
Sharyn W
Sharon Wood <sharyn@shadowmyst.com>
Centereach, New York, USA - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:04 PM
Just got back from a business trip overseas, where I was stuck in a hotel room. I was happy to see a new ep of Stargate to keep me occupied. Imagine my surprise when it ended up being "Meridian." I had no idea Daniel Jackson was being written out of the series.Hopping on the ’net when I got home I discovered the actor portraying Dr. Jackson had left because there was not much for him to do.
I have wondered was happening over the past season and a half as the original characters from the movie were getting less focus. There have been more X-Files type government episodes and less adventure and exploration. And let’s just skip the whole attempted romance thing, okay? I’m in the reserves, dating your 2IC isn’t going to happen.
I watched the show for the adventure, the team interaction and the balance of military and science personalities. Taking out one half of the original movie team members destroys that balance.
The XFiles has tanked in the ratings this season with the loss of an original character. I think it is easy to see where Stargate is going.
You screwed up BIG time MGM and now your viewers are going to have to pay for it. I’ll be paying by switching off.
MB
Mark Bronsen <private>
Washington DC, USA - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 9:14 PM
I really liked the first 3 seasons of SG-1 and fell in love with the character of Daniel JAckson - and the friendship between Jack and DAniel. That was the focus of the movie and the TV show IMHO. I watched while TPTB changed the show in season 4 and 5, watched while they paid more attention to the special effects of their new budget, ignored or killed off existing characters, and sidelined the best character on TV - Dr Daniel Jackson. They didn’t take the time to find out why people watched the show, made incorrect assumptions about what the fans want and finally threw the show away by losing Micheal Shanks and Dr Daniel Jackson. I have never cared so much for a character, never felt so sad at the loss of that character, never cried at an actor leaving a show. I will continue to watch Micheal Shanks in his future acting career - hoping to catch a glimpse of Danny boy. I will continue to re-watch the first 3 seasons on video - but SG-1 is dead without Daniel. I hope the TPTB get what is coming to them - I hope they lose their jobs for the supidity of throwing away a winning formula.Good bye Danny boy - goodbye SG-1
Sarah <seank.sarahc@xtra.co.nz>
Thursday, January 31, 2002, 6:04 PM
I watched Meridian last night, very nicely handled I have to say. I also called Hank Cohen’s office as well. The chap there is sincere in his belief that Mike wanted to leave to persue ’Features’, rather than wanting to go because the writers can’t be bothered to give him enough to do. The writers or at least Robert C Cooper has proved he can write a hell of a script with Meridian, now lets see you write the one where you get the most popular character in Stargate back in the show. Do you have any idea of the number of people who are unhappy with the character leaving?
Perhaps you will when it’s too late and not many people are left who want to watch the show in the next season. Still, it’ll save you having to invest any capital in a film won’t it. Unless Daniel Jackson is in the film there won’t be many viewers left who will be still fans to watch it!Sue <sue_wadsworth@hotmail.com>
England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 5:58 PM
Just wanted to ask Mullie & Mollozzi how it feels to be two of the most hated and despised "people" on the face of the Earth? Does Hollywood still have a black list? If so your names should go on the very top.Why don’t you crawl back under your rock and give us all a break.You think Daniel dying is like Ross’s monkey leaving do you? You bastards! You have ruined our show ,killed Daniel and replaced him in the same episode with a fu*king coward.You think we will still watch? we may be fans but you can only take fandom so far.M.G.M. would have thought better of you.Kim
Preston, United Kingdom - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 5:54 PM
OH shit !are you insane? Daniel dead! Who the hell do you think is gonna watch now.? On behalf of Nerds the world over I’d just like to say.... see ya, see ya ,wouldnt want to be ya. Seth . <not gonna tell you.>
Weston-s-Mare, U.K. - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 5:31 PM
What were you thinking? Ihave just watched Meridian on the tape my daughter gave me ,she did warn me that I wasn’t going to like it but I had to watch. Why did you do this ?kill off the only reason to still watch what was once the best T.V. show ever.I have stuck with this show through the quite frankly very poor fourth and fifth seasons and this is what I get.Are you so out of touch with what we the fans want that you can throw Daniel away?I have read everything on this wonderful site and all I can say is you must be mad. Yes it must be a kind of madness to let someone as popular as Michael Shanks get away from you. You have lost me I can’t watch the show anymore and I know a LOT of people who feel the same.Audrey Preston <None>
usk, Wales - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 5:26 PM
I still can not believe they feel Daniel Jackson is not a character they can develop further. Without his passion and humanity we are left with another "shoot em up" show and I for one will stop watching a show that has kept me captivated for the last 5 years.Without Daniel where can we get the discussions about right and wrong, with a sense of morality added (The Other Side and Scorched Earth are prime examples).
Michael Shanks portrayed Daniel brilliantly over the past 5 years and I can not see any "new character" instantly filling his shoes. This can not bode well for the Series and possible film.
Basically SG1 without Daniel is SG (I don’t know what!!!)
Paula <no1ratgirl@hotmail.com>
Scotland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 4:24 PM
Oh my... I just watched Meridian. Even before I saw it, I knew I would cry. I did.Apart from the fact that Daniel dies, the rest of the episode was certainly one of the best of season 5. I thought it was going to be bad, but it was way better than I expected. I thought that the Jack who actually cares for Daniel was gone after season 3. Nice to see him again. Too bad it had to end that way. Now I’m going to look for stories that bring Daniel back. Because I’m a Denialite, not just Danielite. I know Daniel isn’t dead. He did this ascension-thing anyway, so they can bring him back... But still, I don’t understand why Daniel actually *wanted* to let go. And why Jack let him go. I don’t understand it. That’s one part about the episode I didn’t like. Why couldn’t Jack at least give him a hug in the end?
This is not where it ends. The 6th season doesn’t continue on tv, but in fanfiction. A season that includes Daniel. Whatever they are going to show as a pitiful excuse for season 6 on tv will not be Stargate. There is no Stargate without Daniel.
I know there are many many people who think as I do. They will write Daniel fanfic that I can read. And we’ll all happily deny this episode ever happened.
Karin/Siamkatze <bacteria@aftershocked.org>
Germany - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 1:29 PM
In case anyone was wondering about the monkey comment from Joe Mallozzi.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SG1list/message/1700
(you have to join the group, but it’s open so anyone can)
Q: In a related question, it is well known that on previous TV shows, there have been writers who instituted events on their shows simply because it would upset the fans (the killing off of Iolaus in Hercules: the Legendary Journeys, for example.) What is your professional opinion about this? Like in advertising, is any reaction--good or bad--to be strived for?
A: I don’t really see the point in angering fans just for publicity’s sake. More often than not, a given show may spring a surprise on its loyal viewers (ie. Buffy gets killed!), but it usually ends happily enough for all. Of course, there are occasions when a show loses a much-loved character (that little monkey from Friends or the Ali McGraw character from Dynasty for example). It is unfortunate, but it does happen.
clangers_grrl
Thursday, January 31, 2002, 12:46 PM
To TPTB: Perhaps you should spend some time in a combat unit to understand how it feels to lose a buddy that you have spent five years slogging through the mud with... or barring that, look at the faces of the firefighters who lost their comrades in the line of duty this last September. I feel sorry for your friends in the real world, if this is all your concept of friendship rates. And to Executive Producer Richard Dean Anderson, I’m not close enough to my real life brother to warrant pushing his glasses up his nose, teasing or otherwise, yet if anything ever happened to him, I would certainly shed a tear or two. Probably even more than that. Perhaps you, too, should spend some time with the real thing. I have never been so disappointed with you as an actor or as a man. And I will remember this lack whenever I see your name in the credits of any MOW/series from now on. How do you expect us to ever believe any more that you will be there for your teammates when we have seen how you have been there for the one who’s been there for you for five years? Actually, after this, I don’t particularly want to see Daniel return in sixth season. Yes, he would come back with all his principles and caring intact, but the remainder of SG-1 are no longer worthy of him.Chartreuxus <Chartreuxus@yahoo.com>
L.A., USA - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 12:43 PM
So, this is where all those obscure references to The Wizard of OZ have been leading...
The reinvention of the team ...
Sam ...as DorothyJack ...as the scarecrow
Teal’c ...as the tin man
And introducing
Jonas ...as the cowardly lion .. or is that just the coward,liar,thief.etc.etc.
and you think we will keep watching because?
Sussimo
Dundee, U.K. - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:55 PM
I’m sure you all feel the same way about Michael leaving Stargate SG-1. I went to see him on Sat 26th and he said that it was something he had to do and that he felt he wasn’t reaching his full ptential in the show. Fair enough - but for such a grounding character on SG-1 the so called send off in Meridian last night was quite bad. It didn’t do him any justice for what he has put in to this show. The episode itself was a good one but i felt there was too little emphasis on Michael’s departure. Perhaps this means that he will come back. If not then he really wasn’t appreciated enough on this show. I for one don’t think the series should be called SG-1 because without him there just isn’t an SG-1!!!!! And to think that jonas fella is gonna replace him - they could of at least spent a bit more money on a proper actor rather than use a cardboard cut out!! Look at me ranting on - but you all know what i mean don’t you!! BRING DANNY BACK!!!!AAAAHHHH!!!!!
from ANoushka xxAnoushka <bougsta@hotmail.com>
West sx burgess hill, UK - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 12:24 PM
"Meridian" was unbearably depressing. I cried solidly for the whole hour of the episode and for half an hour afterwards. Now, nearly 24 hours later, I can’t even think about the episode too closely without getting tears in my eyes.Major kudos to Robert C Cooper who wrote a masterpiece. I loved the acting too.
I think it goes without saying Michael Shanks was totally outstanding, even when he only had his voice and eyes to rely on in the later infirmary scenes.
For me, this was the end of Season 6. Especially if Jonas is the new guy. He was a cold emotionless nobody, with none of the warmth, caring, compassion and love that Daniel exuded.
Finally, I thought the make up people deserve an award as well for the job they did making Mr Shanks up - it was very believable and quite horrible.
Andi
Andi <andrea_fry@yahoo.co.uk>
Bristol, England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 11:52 AM
So Mallozzi believes SG-1 losing Daniel is like Ross losing his monkey, well...Put enough monkeys in a room with enough typewriters and they’ll eventually produce a decent Stargate script. Shame the same can’t be said about Mallozzi.
Stargate without Daniel isn’t Stargate. I’m with all those hitting the off switch.
Hapshut <hapshut@yahoo.com>
London, England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 11:40 AM
I thought Daniel/Micheael Shanks was popular?
What happened? My wife cried all last night-we had no idea. I went online to try and find out what is happening, and now that I know I am afriad to tell her, I don’t want her crying again. The show was brill, and one of the few things we both watched together. I’m not sure I’ll ever get her to watch again. Seriouly, what happend? I’ve seen ads for Michael Shanks to appear at conventions lately, why if he’s out of the show?Steven Walters <sue_steve@yahoo.co.uk>
Birmingham, UK - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 11:27 AM
Anyone elese feel cheated betrayed? Although it was a beautiful episode well done by all the actors it should never have come about at all! Goodbye Daniel Jackson it’s been fun we’ll all miss you!**sniff sniff**Any UK fans here is an address to write to:
Correspondance
Sky Subscriber Services
4 Makintosh House
Livingston
West Lothian
EH54 7BW
They have to respond to every letter and forward to to the appropriate people.
squeezy10
Scotland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 11:07 AM
I’ve come back in to leave another message. But even now I still can’t think of anything to say. Yes, I’m ANGRY. I’ve never been so worked up about a television series in my life and I’ve been in enough fandoms, but those things Malozzi said have really worked my up even more. I can’t believe he could be so stupid as to say something like that at this time.
I don’t know if I made myself abundantly clear before or not. I’m leaving. I’m not leaving the fandom, I could never do that as I care far too much about jack and daniel to leave. But I will NOT be watching anymore episodes. Wonder what the ratings will be like for revelations next week because I’m not watching.
And can I just say I’m very worried for everyone who is staying with the show. The last proper episode we had without Daniel was ’Prodigy’... oh dear... do I hear the sounds of someone digging his own grave?linsey <linsey_kree@hotmail.com>
perth, scotland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:47 AM
In common with many other people who have recorded their thoughts on this board, it was the historical and mythical aspects of ’Stargate’ that appealed most strongly. With the loss of Daniel Jackson, these storylines have obviously been jettisoned, thereby losing the unique element that made ’Stargate’ different from all the other less demanding and less thoughtful series. The last series has been disapointing with infrequent use of the Stargate and quite frankly silly sub X-File type plots and supposedly comical characters.
It is highly unlikely that I and the other three members of my household who watch this once excellent programme will continue to watch.
Fools!
Jeemy Dodd <burma@supanet.com>
England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:40 AM
Hello,
I just thought I would add my voice to this protest in the treatment and consequent elimination of Micheal Shanks and his character. I watched Meridian last night over the internet after hearing about MS’s departure, I wanted to see for myself if MGM could be as completely brainless as this move would suggest. I for one will no longer be watching Stargate now that Daniel Jackson has gone. You have lost not onle an avid viewer (who got Showtime just to watch Stargate on), but a consumer as well. I will be dropping Showtime as soon as Meridian airs in the states and refuse to even acknowledge the idea that the show will go on without Micheal Shanks. His character was the heart and soul of this show and without him, I cannot and will not watch it. This is your loss.Courtney <emsworth3@yahoo.com>
New Orleans, Louisiana - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:26 AM
I have just read the last post and I could kill someone, no not just someone Joseph Mallozzi!!! Obnoxious is to good a word for him. So Daniel dying is like Ross’s MONKEY leaving in friends! GOD I AM SO ANGRY RIGHT NOW I DONT TRUST MYSELF TO WRITE MUCH MORE.Goodbye Stargate I am out of here.Mary Connor
Dublin, Ireland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 9:29 AM
I’ve watched the way Daniel has been pushed into the background for the past two years with increasing frustration but assumed that it was because Michael Shanks was making a lot of films and so couldn’t work full-time on Stargate. Then I watched Daniel written out of the show last night in total disbelief. I came on line to try to find out when he would be coming back. It didn’t occur to me they would be STUPID enough to think they could have a show without one of the two main characters. Then I started reading everywhere and realized that Michael Shanks hadn’t been making films at all, he’d just been the victim of petty, inept and spiteful writers who had finally driven him to quit before Daniel had even less to do than he does now. It never occurred to me for an instant that he was AVAILABLE and they were treating Daniel like this! Then I followed some links to interviews with Joseph Mallozzi, the writer who has written most of the episodes in the last two seasons I like LEAST. My heart already sank every time I saw his name on the credits but I didn’t realize what a thoroughly NASTY piece of work he was until I saw the kind of people he talks to and the kind of things he says. His latest piece of nastiness is comparing Daniel dying to Ross’s monkey leaving in "Friends". Oh how witty and intelligent. We lose the character who opened the Stargate in the first place and Jack, Sam and Teal’c lose their best friend and Mallozzi compares it to Ross having to give up his pet. My sides are splitting.
Tell me, Mr Joseph Mallozzi, do you get paid extra for being gratuitously offensive to Michael Shanks, Daniel Jackson, and his fans, or is it a service you provide for free? And Mr Hank Cohen and Mr Brad Wright, if you don’t know what your thoroughly OBNOXIOUS little representative has been doing on the Internet, you ought to, and if you do and you support him I sincerely hope you get FIRED as a consequence of his actions when MGM gets bought out.
I’m weeping for Daniel and for Jack, Sam, Teal’c, Janet and Hammond, at having to manage without him, and I’m SO sorry for Richard D Anderson, Amanda Tapping, Christopher Judge, Teryl Rothery and Don S Davis because they are such fine actors and the incompetent writers by treating Daniel so badly have killed the show out from under them. But I’m so GLAD Michael Shanks has got away from a place and from people who would treat him like this. I will never watch an episode of Stargate in which he doesn’t appear and I will never watch anything paid for by MGM as long as they are paying Joseph Mallozzi’s wages. As far as I’m concerned the last episode of Stargate has already aired. It was called "Meridian".
Anne H
Anne H <manitou489@yahoo.co.uk>
Kent, England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 8:56 AM
Now I’m coherent enough to say something.
I watched the episode this morning, and despite the fact it was terrific, the acting was superb and the angst incredible, I can only be upset and angry over all this situation.
I’m not sure if TPTB realise that Daniel is very needed. He was the heart of this story. I watched this show mainly because of him. Now what is left?Nausica
Barcelona, Spain - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 8:53 AM
So we are a vocal contingent are we? I think you are about to find out that we are in fact a vocal army. This army is marching away from Stargate double quick time.Penny Cullin <Private>
Barnstable, United Kingdom - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 8:47 AM
Well you have just lost yourselves another viewer,I dont expect you care its just one right, just one more.The thing is all these ones add up to one hell of a lot of people, people who like me wont watch season six. To have lost Daniel was the last straw, the last two seasons have been at time almost painfully bad. Yes I know that’s mostly down to Mullie and Mollozzi but they do work for you ,not the other way around.Please get Michael back he really does know what we want,you will earn back our respect. It takes a big man to admit he has been wrong ,come on you can do it. Pick up the phone Mr Cohen, speak to Michael .Show us that the" G" in M.G.M. also stand for great.Jamie <NO E-MAIL SORRY.>
Brighton, U.K. - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 8:42 AM
Looks like MGM are gonna hav to pay the price of ripping out one of the main characters. Hundreds, if not thousands of viewers are now former viewers. I will keep watching Sg-1 but MGM are gonna pay! It’s sad really, watching such a great series go downhill! Mr. Shanks has been a great contribution to the whole concept of Stargate and I wish him well. This has been a huge mistake! >=(XPoDX <xp0dx@hotmail.com>
Middlesboro, England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 7:36 AM
can any one tell what is MGM thinking how can they right out dr jackson as i watched last night and saw daniel dying it was just so wrong how can they think that you can just take out some one who is so important to the show i have watched the show from the start but i am not sure if i can watch any more without daniel in it or any of the cast
we can only hope the MGM see what they doing, who ever came up with the idea to wright him out should be fired
thank you VERY UNHAPPY VIEWERdave <hhne13282@blueyonder.co.uk>
newcastle, uk - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 6:47 AM
I have been a fan since the film, but loved the series even more. They have made a grave mistake letting Michael Shanks leave, I will not be watching unless he is brought back somehow!! :o(Mjud <judgecon@eircom.net>
Kildare, Ireland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 6:20 AM
Well, I’ve just watched Meridian through squintyvision. I found it powerful and very well acted. I feel sad, so very sad, and teared up often while viewing it (not normal for me at all.) I’m very glad that Daniel got to go with Oma for he will still be out there making discoveries and being true to what makes him Daniel Jackson. Unfortunately, I can’t help but feel that everything he stood for (the searching, the learning, the interacting, the shear joy of discovery) those elements of the show have probably have left with him and I loved that part of Stargate. I know I won’t be a regular viewer anymore because I don’t want to see a purely military show. The truth is that the best part of this show just walked out through the stargate, and when he did, my immediate desire was to want to know what Daniel was doing, where was he going. Daniel is still continuing on his journey and I’m very sad that we will probably never learn more of it.I really, really think TPTB have made a terrible mistake in choosing to take this road and that their pride will prevent them from acting NOW to lessen their mistakes. They’ve lost sight of what their show was about--and that’s the saddist part of all.
Anyway, I think the cast did an awesome job and Robert Cooper was able to create a fantastic script. (RCC? I’d give you an oscar, if I could.)
I should also mention that when I started to play the episode, my 69 year old mother who is also quite a fan of the show, quickly got up and left the room, stating that she did not want to watch that, and she couldn’t bear to see Daniel die. So, actually, you’ve lost two viewers. TPTB must have viewers to spare since they can toss so many of us away. Huh, disposible viewers; what an interesting strategy to have in the TV business.
Sue G <kelpie@earthlink.net>
San Dimas, CA/USofA - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 5:03 AM
Well T.P.T.B. you had to do it ,didnt you? Throw away the best damn thing on the box.Get him back, no wait you dont deserve him, hell you dont deserve US ,the fans.Heres one more fan that wont watch another episode or buy one more tape or d.v.d. etc. Season six? stuff it up you ass.!!!!Aimie .
Bradford, England - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 4:53 AM
To quote:
"Daniel Jackson made this place happen. As a member of SG-1, he was our voice, our conscience. He was a very courageous man, he was a good man. For those of us lucky enough to have known him, he was also a friend."
Col. Jack O’Neill, USAF - ’Fire & Water’I think you folk forgot something along the way. ’SG-1’ is a team.
The word ’team’ is defined in Webster’s as:[noun]2. two or more persons working together. [verb] join in a team or in common activity.
Daniel was a ’teammate’ of SG-1: member of the same team.
They survived by ’teamwork’: combined action, cooperation.
What part of this entire package is difficult to understand? You had a very successful show called "Stargate:SG-1" based on the various missions and situations that a team comprised of civilian and military specialists encountered. It was entertaining, challenging, informative and enjoyable to watch. The various characters, their strengths and foibles, their interactions, drew me back each week. I knew there would be one hour a week I could sit back and be entertained and not have my intelligence insulted.
Now? You’ve broken that very functional team and turned your excellent program into dross.
I’d like to say I’m sorry for you, but I find it hard. My sorrow goes to those men and women who have spent 5 years of their lives creating the ‘Wonder That Was Stargate’ only to see it crumbling to dust at their feet.
And I feel sorry for the United States Air Force after all they did to help the show keep the proper action and feel. I’m sure they have a somewhat bitter taste in their mouth right now.
seticat <seticat@attbi.com>
Tacoma, WA, USA - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 4:26 AM
Please just tell me that the real Stargate SG-1 will step out of the shower and let us know this was all just a terrible dream? Maybe then we can get back to quality writing, interesting storylines, the original team dynamic, and Michael Shanks as Daniel Jackson – a meaningful and fully-contributing member of SG-1.I don’t have anything to ask – just something to say: You’ve taken an intelligent, well-written, awe-inspiring show and ruined it with sub-par, inconsistent and lazy writing, unrecognizable characters, ridiculous plotlines, and marginalizing your most popular character. Big mistake. HUGE mistake.
I’m done with Stargate SG-1. There is no SG-1 without Daniel.
Shame on you.
Marcia <soplotzalready@msn.com>
St. Louis, MO, USA - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 9:55 PM
I’ve been ’listening’to the Meridian spoilers and comments all evening. Regardless of ones feelings regarding the character, to a person everyone agrees this was a tribute to all the character of Daniel Jackson stood for from the movie onward. Bless Mr. Cooper for this final ’parting’ gift to Daniel and to us. I find it shameful in the extreme that events reached this point in the first place, but at least in the end, and despite the introduction of the new character in a way that makes him complicit in Daniel’s death (something that makes it difficult for me to buy into him as a future team member - I mean our team, Daniel’s friends, are supposed to be okay with this?), they did prove they knew who Daniel was all along. It’s just too da** bad they didn’t remember sooner.
Gina
Gina Norman <getalife_notmine@yahoo.com>
New York, NY, USA - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 7:29 PM
I felt that Meridian was a fitting tribute to be honest and if Daniel was going, that was a credible way to let him go.However...
The whole ep showed succinctly why Daniel should never have been written out in the first place. I know Michael’s reason for leaving, we’ve read it and heard it first hand, but it should never have been necessary. Stargate is about many things; exploration, discovery, the human race learning about other cultures and about itself and the evolution of humanity into a space faring race. *All* the members of SG1 have their part to play in this evolution and now the heart is gone. The moral centre of the team. The man who "could look outside the box instead of relying on orders to achieve a goal" I’m paraphrasing, but that was said by the man who played Daniel Jackson and made him the character we know and love. This is a huge hole to fill and with the best will in the world, Jonas is not the man to fill it. He begins with a cowardice and an involvemnent in Daniel’s death (and don’t try and bulls**t us, to all intents and purposes, the guy is gone) that would preclude any member of SG1 trusting him.
Daniel was the child in all of us, with an insatiable quest for knowledge. He went through the gate with high hopes and expectations which were very often dashed, but he embarked upon every mission with a clean slate and his optimism in tact. Just as Sam said, he brought out the best in them all and Michael Shanks’ performance has indeed done a similar job with many of the show’s fans. By making us love Daniel and admire the character, he has brought out aspects of ourselves we never knew were there and inspired us to be more than we were. All this can’t be dismissed.
The team is gone. It was bad enough that we were *treated* to the whole Sam/Jack debacle, but during this season, some of the writers found it necessary to slowly but surely excise Daniel from the team. Thank goodness for Robert C Cooper, he at least had enough respect for the relationships which *really* existed in the show to give Daniel a fitting send off. I was pleasantly surprised. It still hurt and it was still totally unnecessary and I still won’t be watching season six without him, but the way he chose to continue his journey was quintessentially Daniel IMO. So thank you to Mr Cooper for that, thank you to the phenomenally talented Michael Shanks for bringing him to us for five wonderful years and shame on those who drove him and us away by destroying the nature of this marvellous show.
Wadjet <munko@erehwon.karoo.co.uk>
Hull East Yorkshire, UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 6:38 PM
meet michael shanks yesterday in Dublin and watched Meridan tonight..what a contrast.....every single person was made to feel welcome yesterday with a smile and a thank you to every one there...and now tonight Daniel’s gone.....walking off in to the rippling sunset....
MS is a truely lovely man and nothing like Daniel Jackson I’ve been watching season 5 on sky with increasing unease and Meridian just topped it all off.... MGM have never realised what an asset they had in Michael Shanks and Daniel Jackson and now it’s too late.....
I wish Michael Shanks every success in the future.... and all his Irish fan will be right there with him.....Áine <aine68@eircom.net>
Galway, Ireland - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 6:15 PM
I too expected him to live. I cannot believe it will be hard to watch it with one of the team missing??????
It will not be the same and I think some people will stop watching!David Porter <style@barclays.net>
Sheffield, UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:55 PM
"The very young do not always do as they’re told"
Putting aside the anger etc that my fellow fans and I are feeling, I would like to enquire what has happened to the notion of plot consistency? The reason I fell in love with the movie and the series was the whole archeology, ancient gods as aliens spin the story had to it. If you get rid of the archeologist, the series obviously veers into the rut it has lately followed. SG-1, without Michael/Daniel, becomes a pseudo-X-files-wannabe with NID behind every bush. Furthermore, the inclusion of Jonas (who is just this guy who wouldn’t risk his life to save his own planet - heck no! let the earthling fall!) feels wrong to the SG1 team dynamic. The deletion of a main character and his relegation to, at best, an Obi Wan occassional appearance in a halo is just sad. It’s been done before, yawn, yawn... so why bother to watch? Without Daniel Jackson the show, quite frankly, makes no sense at all! Yael dJBS <yaelie@cwcom.net>
Watford, United Kingdom - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:42 PM
Damn.
I just watched that episode and I expected him to live.
It’s going to be hard to watch it with one of the team missing.
Credit to Michael Shanks. I am full of praise for his portrayal of Daniel Jackson.James
UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:32 PM
I’ve watched many sci-fi shows over the years but never had the attachment that I have for Stargate SG-1 and Daniel Jackson. I cannot believe that the writters and producers believe that Daniel’s departure will be accepted without a murmer from the fans. Daniel is the Stargate and without him the heart and soul of the show has gone. Michael Shanks is an amazing actor and gave Daniel’s character a real depth. I have this evening just watched Meridian and was very disappointed with the way Daniel’s departure was handled. Where was the emotion? Where was the passion? Where was the concerted effort to save him? I have to admit I thought the scene with Teal’c was touching but for Jack and Sam it seemed to be business as usual. Over the last couple of seasons Daniel has gone from main chracter to back ground decoration - this is not acceptable to the fans. Bring back the wonders of new worlds, bring back the mythical asspect of the show but most of all bring back Daniel Jackson. sue post <lunar@blueyonder.co.uk>
london, england - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:26 PM
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE? Not only have you not picked up your performance after the last disasterous season but you have let go, nay pushed away, your one remaining ace in the hole. Michael Shanks aka Dr Daniel Jackson was the heart of SG-1 & the real drawcard for thousands of fans. To undermine the intelligence & integrity of your fan base is a HUGE mistake & one you will live to regret if you continue on the way you are going. We loved the team dynamics: the shared adventure, the friendship, the humour, the die-for-each-other loyalty, the compassion, etc. Where did that go? More importantly, WHY did that go? That formula was what kept the show at the top of the ratings. Changing the formula was a slap in the face to the fans who have supported the show over the years and the beginning of the end for the best sci fi show of all time. Instead of going out on a high note it will now end in a whimper with its tail between its legs. SHAME SHAME SHAME.Katherine Stanley <mwhic@easynet.net.au>
Australia - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:21 PM
How can you seriously get rid of Daniel. Don’t you realise that he is the best bit of the show. He read all the alien and old languages, he interprets the meanings given to the artefact. Who will do it now? He is the conscience of the team. He makes Jack think about the potential consequences of his actions. Carter is too busy mooning about Jack and although she occasionally pulls a face, she does just as Jack tells her. He is the Colonel after all. Even our friendly Jaffa just raises an eyebrow. The show desperately needs Daniel. I am very unhappy about his departure, but I feel that as the show falls into the pit of obscurity, Michael Shanks will rise as a very popular star. Good luck to him. Anna
Manchester, England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:54 PM
I have a question - Why?Do you realise what you have done...Wise up. You have just lost a very valuable commodity. I thought you were business people!! Are you really so cheap that you are willing to lose one of your best assets.
Michael Shanks is a superb actor who can capture the Stargate audience in a heartbeat. The relationship between Jack and Daniel is the essence of Stargate. Science Fiction fans are incredibly loyal to their shows and deserve the same from the Powers that Be.
MGM reaps the rewards when not only the show is sold all over the world, but the merchandise including DVD’s and Video’s are snapped up eagerly. Do we moan about prices. NO. We happily pay top dollar for anything to do with our favourite show.
Well - to quote Pretty Woman "BIG MISTAKE, BIG MISTAKE!"...Do you think we trust you NOW. You have taken our show and just ripped the heart out of it because you couldn’t get off your ass and make it right.
You didn’t listen to what Michael wanted and you let him go, thinking that the Stargate fandom is forever safe. The whole point about SG1 is that its a TEAM show. Every character is essential to make it work. Do you think that we will happily stand by and watch as other actors are brought in to placate us. Dream on. We want Michael. Do something about it or shove your show where the sun don’t shine!
(Sorry, just watched Meridian and had to vent off a little steam)...
Elizabeth (alias Wookie@ukgateway.net)
Elizabeth Wylie <wookie@ukgateway.net>
London, UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:45 PM
I can not believe you have written daniel out of the show it will not be the same without him WAKE UP the fans want him backRobert Willoughby <rob.srss@btinternet.com>
slough, uk - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:29 PM
I really can’t believe that you have written Daniel Jackson out of Stargate. Michael Shanks caracter was at the centre of Stargate. He brought sanity to the programme and the calming influence. Apart from anything else he is so good looking. I really like Richard Dean Anderson but the programme will be nothing without their on screen chemistry. I for one will not be looking forward to the new season. What a mistake!!Lynne Keir <lynnekeir@talk21.com>
Chorley, UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:24 PM
On behalf of "nerds" everywhere, the show is going to be missing a vital piece. The SG-1 TEAM needs him! Who do they think they’ll get to replace him, seeing as how he is irreplaceable!Melinda Rice <si@play63.freeserve.co.uk>
Chesterfield, England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:18 PM
I don’t understand why MGM think Michael Shanks is dispensable. I adore Richard Dean Anderson but to me, Michael is the star. They should BOTH have their name above the credits. I know RDA played MacGuyver but he’s really known here as Jack O’Neill. He isn’t a star in that way here in the UK so the marketing makes no sense. Cover after cover after cover of videos and DVDs with RDA on them, and often Amanda Tapping, but no Michael. All the elements of the show the majority of fans hate, MGM seems determined to shove down our throats. I’m disgusted at the 100th episode celebration in which we get a SamJackfest and Daniel, who opened the gate, gets screweed again. Hey, when Stargate goes down the tubes and Michael has a leading role in Ally McBeal or ER or some other lucky prime time show, I wonder if MGM will realise then they made a HUGE mistake?
Stargate is a small show in the US. It’s huge in the UK. Michael is the only cast member who can sell a magazine with his name and his face on the cover. E.g. his face on the cover of TV Zone had the magazine sold out in no time flat. Michael Shanks. Not Daniel. Michael.
The lovely Michael Shanks SELLS. This is so simple even MGM should have grasped it. He’s an amazingly talented actor, so damned good he doesn’t even SOUND like his character let alone look like him. He’s clever, funny, sweet and warm...a genuinely nice and likeable man who only wants to do good work, learn in his craft and be challenged so he grows as an actor. He’s also young and drop-dead gorgeous. The fans love him to death - he’s a darling - and his girlfriend Lexa Doig is equally lovely.
This is an actor with a vast cohort of loyal fans who adore him - he’s every TV producers dream. Every age, every gender, every background, every damn country Stargate is sold in, we adore Daniel and we respect his actor. Michael is bankable in every single demographic. Look at the damn webrings and fansites.
I agree Michael doesn’t have the popularity of RDA online. Not even close.
For Michael’s online popularity, try BRAD PITT. Other scifi leads like Ben Browder don’t even come close.
I hate blind, ignorant stupidity. I hate what MGM have done to Michael because of it. I hate what they’ve done to the show. I hate what they’re doing to us. I can’t believe Michael doesn’t count and we don’t count.
Hey, we get the message. Don’t let the audience hit you in the ass on its way out.
Angela
UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 2:42 PM
I’d like to ask TPTB if they realize how many thousands of dollars, not to mention hours of effort, have now been spent by fans of the show on this website, professionally designed ads, ads placed in professional publications, and more? Do you realize that all of that money could have been spent on merchandising for your show? Or promoting the show wholeheartedly? Do you realize that we would have rather been doing that with all of this disposable income? Was the shift in focus to try to nab that coveted teen demographic worth losing your core audience? The fans who supported you for years? Has such a shift *ever* worked for an already established show? You were at the top of your game and you seem to have thrown it all away. Trust me on this. I watched Stargate in the past for a hell of a lot more reasons than a "handsome hunk" (MGM’s stellar description of Corin Nemec) or a "sexy Tok’ra" (Anise, of course!). Hank Cohen, are you listening? This middle-aged female viewer has plenty of disposable income to spare.Ann
Orlando, FL - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 1:04 PM
Why did you do it? Why throw away Daniel and us with him?I wont watch another episode and I am not alone.If you had to push someone out why not Mollozzi & Mullie? or the person who hired them.My dog could come up with a better script than them .Come on WAKE UP !!! GET HIM BACK. MAISEY-JAYNE
New Quay, England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 6:14 AM
Stargate has become a living thing which has grown and evolved in the past few years. Any living thing needs the essentials to survive. Jack is chatacter in which we can take shelter when all else is going wrong. Sam provides sustainance and intelligence to the show. Teal’c is the character from which we take strength and courage. Daniel provides love and compassion. So losing him is like ripping out the heart of the show. Please don’t rip out our hearts!squeezy10
Scotland - Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 8:37 PM
It’s not really a question ,more a request, would the last one out please switch off the lights.Bobby Guest
Trowbridge, Great Britain - Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 9:00 AM
So you had to change the new guy’s name to Jonas, why not go all the way and make it Jonah, as in bringer of bad luckmnxy
london, England - Saturday, January 26, 2002, 8:25 AM
Experts agree! Everything is fine!
Daniel was never an important character! You haven’t been shoving him out the door for two seasons, Mr. Shanks just has an inflated view of his character’s importance, right?
And Mr. Shanks has second billing... because?
Why don’t you shove your revisionist history up your stupid asses?Sage
Friday, January 25, 2002, 1:16 PM
My dear PTB’s: I wasn’t going to ask you a thing but I’ve brooded long enough and now I do have some questions, so please bear with me. 1. Is it possible that your writers have become creatively burned out? Is that why they went after formulaic UST? That’s fine on X-files, guys, but Mulder and Scully always smouldered and threw sparks and THAT was a beautiful thing. Sam and Jack is contrived and it makes long-time viewers (especially those of us who came to you with the movie) uncomfortable. Daniel and Sha’re worked, too. Sam and Jack is just plain silliness. 2. Has it really been so bad to let a competent general with a good heart (and a direct line to the president) run a complex operation with a minimum of fuss? Do you now have to aggravate your audience with goons of the week? Why? So guest stars can muddy the waters and alienate those of us who HATE that sort of thing? If we wanted to subject ourselves to this stuff we would join the military or the government. 3. Is the writing of exploration and ancient or exotic cultures so difficult that you have to reduce your resident explorer-linguist-archaeologist to a ghost, thereby eliminating the need to write creatively? Come on guys, this stuff is what keeps your core audience coming back every week! Write more like Beast of Burden, The First Ones, Cold Lazarus, Fire and Water. 4. Are buddy storylines so passe that you have to deliberately write out all traces of the carefully developed and very plausible guy-guy friendship that spawned the program that you are now so willfully destroying? Why are you doing this? 5. Do you need more writers who are creative and really into this show? Just look at the fan fiction networks and hire a writer of-the-week. Come to think of it, why aren’t there any women writers for this show? 6. Why haven’t you written more about the history and culture of the Jaffa? What is going on now, today, with their movement to oppose the Goau’ld? Can we have more about Teal’c’s history? 7. And could we have more about all of the characters at home, or more of them interacting outside SGC?. That’s what makes characters more real to viewers. 8. One last thing, and this is a big one. Most TV programs want consistency in their storylines and characters. Did your guidelines get eaten by your dog? Why did you make Jack such an antagonistic, unpleasant, impatient, moron last year? It all looks so forced; I’ve never seen RDA have to act so untrue to one of his characters. MacGyver was always steady. Viewers like continuity in a character’s personality. What you did with this character is inexcusable--never mind the "we wanted to make him less heroic" excuse; it’s lame. And it didn’t stop with Jack. Why did you make Sam girly Sam one moment and bossy know-it-all, ready to take over every scene Sam the next? I used to love Sam, now I just want to get rid of her. Funny thing, I watched SG-1 recently with a friend who hasn’t seen it in a while. Here’s what she said: "I don’t like the chica. There’s too much of her and she’s too bossy. What is her rank?" Really--and I’d not said a word about any of this when we sat down to watch. 8. My final question: What am I really asking? Just this: put it back the way it was, please? Call back MS, restore Daniel Jackson and write stories around him. Lots of stories. Watch your ratings rise. Then you can spin off anything you like. Yrye <Yrye3stars@aol.com>
NY, USA - Wednesday, January 23, 2002, 12:15 AM
Hey, I’ve been to several cons. Whenever I’m in the dealer’s room, I go looking for official photos. There are literally NO photos of Daniel with short hair. Why? I like the short hair better! You can see his beautiful eyes and cheekbones better. :)Please, give me some pictures with short hair!
Xochiquetzl
Atlanta, GA - Saturday, January 19, 2002, 8:03 AM
Less McGyver, less X-Files, more Stargate, more Teal’cMaureen <maureen@boondock.com>
Boondock, Tellus Tertius - Monday, January 14, 2002, 6:20 PM
Hey,I’m a big Sam fan and love her to pieces, but I really really DON’T want her to be the love interest of the week. I think it’s insulting. I think the highest point of Sam’s characterization was seasons two and three. I particularly like the stuff with Sam and her dad, and Sam hanging out with Janet and Cassie, and Sam fixing up her motorcycle. "Rite of Passage" is a recent excellent example. Could we have more of that and less of Sam and her boyfriend of the week?
Sage
Saturday, January 12, 2002, 2:58 PM
I heard of a company that does custom action figures. They want $300 apiece. I’ve actually considered shelling that much out to have my own little Daniel to sit on my desk at work. How sad is that?
Xochiquetzl
Etlanna, Jawjah - Friday, January 11, 2002, 10:12 PM
Since this whole nonsense started I’ve had a lot of questions about why TPTB at MGM did what they did by treating Micheal soo badly and the sad thing is I will never understand their actions.What they did to Micheal Shanks the character of Daniel Jackson and the spirit that made StarGate SG-1 SO UNIQUE AND SPECIAL SINCE THE VERY BEGINNING IS FOREVER GONE. Iam VERY VERY DISGUSTED at the way this show turned out and a great actor was forced off because you didn’t take the time to care about him or how the fans would react to his leaving. GIMME A BREAK AND STOP KILLING OFF ALL THE "GOOD" (GUYS) AND BRING Micheal Shanks AND Daniel Jackson BACK WHERE THEY SHOULD BE ON StarGate SG-1.Sandra D. Mc.donald <deem31@webtv.net>
Lancaster, Pennsylvania - Wednesday, January 9, 2002, 12:09 PM
I wanted to support what everyone else has written, about the way the characters of the whole of SG1 have been simplified to the point of idiocy. And to register my protest at the way Michael Shanks has been marginalised, in so many, many ways. For instance, I was really looking forward to seeing the Stargate calendar - and when I saw it at SG3 last November, was glad I hadn’t ordered it sight unseen. *No* photos of Michael Shanks. Many friends, on seeing it, tried to cancel their orders. Now that we’ve seen a good half of Season 5 in England, it is painfully obvious why Michael decided to leave. After the wonderful Season 3, Season 4 was a letdown, but Season 5 is disastrous. There will be no more DVD profits from me for you, no big viewing figures to trumpet to advertisers. Without Michael Shanks playing Daniel Jackson, all the passion, excitement, quickwittedness and plain oldfashioned magnetism has just disappeared. 95% of the team dynamic disappeared last year, the show is often no longer a pleasure to watch. Even Summit, which should be concentrating on Daniel if anything is, was cursory - don’t you think we’d be *interested* in seeing what it was like to infiltrate a space station peopled by Goa’uld and their slaves. How do the slaves live? What does a minor Goa’uld do? Don’t you think some elaboration of this would be more interesting than *another* attack on *another* Tok’ra outpost? More falling plastic rocks and crystals! Hoo-eee - not. Please realise that you have mature, sophisticated fans in the fanbase (yes, its another one of those professional women in their forties thats writing) and show some respect to both the fans and what Stargate SG1 could be - indeed, what it *used* to be.Jan <innerteenager@yahoo.co.uk>
London, England - Sunday, January 6, 2002, 11:09 AM
Hi, Just a quick question. As a dedicated fan of the series, and a consumer who up until now has purchased vids, DVDs, etc, does my opinion no longer matter? Stargate SG.1 is the most amazing scifi series to grace our screens (both big & small) since the classic Star Trek series. The concept of space travel via a stargate was presented in a logical, viable & excitingly believable way. Not only that but the characters had depth & the heroes displayed not only strength, bravery & battle savy but also intelligence, compassion, a commitment to peace & doing the right thing. AND the icing on the cake - the relationships between the four main characters. I have watched with dismay over the past season as the dynamics between the team became little more than those expected from mere work mates rather than the family they had become over the years. I don’t understand why TPTB felt it necessary to change a winning formula. If it AIN’T BROKE DON’T FIX IT. I am really disspointed to say the least & am sure that given enough rope to hang yourself we’ll be telling you ’WE TOLD YOU SO’ when the series goes down the gurgler!Femtastic34 <donnalee@mcs.net.au>
QLD, Australia - Saturday, January 5, 2002, 7:20 PM
Are you insane? Stargate is a great show, or at least it was. You are ruining the very thing that makes the show so great, by spliting up the team. Not just because Michael Shanks is leaving, but because you are ruining the way the team work together. Look at some of the earlier eppisodes and see the team dynamic there. It’s not in the more recent eppisodes. So why don’t you try to rebuild it before the show is a total failure? Tesekian <Tesekian@stargatesg-1.com>
Saturday, January 5, 2002, 8:01 AM
Why is it not enough that Samantha Carter be a competent, professional soldier and scientist? Why does she have to throw herself at a love interest every week lately? (All of whom consequently die.) It’s like her biological clock is running down and she’s desperate to find someone to live happily ever after with. This is not the Sam Carter I watched in Season one through three! It’s not like we see Teal’c, Jack and Daniel pointlessly throwing themselves at the guest star of the week or at each other. If it’s because she’s a "female"; well, Janet’s never been given the slightest hint of a love interest.
I watch the show to see the team going through the stargate to explore new worlds and new cultures, not to watch a formula that failed way back when "Bonanza" was on.
And why we’re on the subject of Sam, why isn’t she allowed to be friends with the guys? Men and women CAN be friends, you know, without any romantic entanglements.
Just wondering...
kelly
Kelly <kw1vt@att.net>
Boston, MA - Friday, January 4, 2002, 10:25 PM
A question for the ages: Why fix something that isn’t broken? I am an avid fan of Stargate SG-1 and have been watching it faithfully since it premiered five years ago. I loved it for its adventure, excitement, and fun. I also watched it because it was intelligent, uplifting and had great character depth and interactions. It looked beyond the earth for not only technological advancement, but historical and perhaps even spiritual answers. I’ve missed that as it’s become plain since Season 4 that the direction of the show was moving more towards earth-bound conspiracies and X-file type characters and plotlines. It did not surprise me to read in September that Michael Shanks decided to leave the show as his character’s value became less and less significant. It was the cherry on top of an already crappy month. Since then, I’ve been really trying to wrap my head around what TPTB were thinking when they decided to pursue this storyline and what Stargate SG-1 will be like without Daniel Jackson. Try as I might, I have only questions – lots of them. So here goes:
Why the change in direction of the show? Why are interactions between the characters cold and distant? Why is there less character development? Why was the character of Daniel Jackson (whose very nature was scholarly, passionate about understanding other cultures, always seeking peaceful solutions and NON-military) subjected to far-fetched, Rambo-like machinations as this earth-bound conspiracy unfolded? Why will Daniel’s departure be treated as business-as-usual without emotion or even a modicum of reverence? Will he really be coming back occasionally or are you just blowing smoke?
I’m not an obsessed fan, just a concerned one – one that normally doesn’t react to personnel changes in favorite TV programs. When I read that Michael Shanks was leaving and so was his character, I surprised myself at how much I was vested in this show’s original direction and became more than a little outraged that a critical character is to be dismissed so frivilously. I can hardly blame Michael Shanks for his decision - I respect and understand why. His character was integral to the original movie and is integral to this show. I only wish TPTB could have recognized that fact.
In my opinion, Daniel Jackson was our voice as plain, non-military citizens – he spoke for us, which is why I won’t be able to watch Season 6 without him. Thanks for listening.
Marcia <soplotzalready@msn.com>
St. Louis, MO USA - Friday, January 4, 2002, 8:04 PM
I just want to add my voice to the crowd and say that if Stargate continues along the path it has taken I for one will not watch the next season. A politically motivated, earth based conspiracy show is not what I love about Stargate, if I wanted this I’d watch the X-Files. To have this storyline at the loss of Daniel Jackson is truly a despicable state of affairs. Surely if you have a formula that works, the Stargate that has been bringing in fans fo four seasons, you stick with it?
I respect Michael Shanks’ decision to leave based on the direction the show is taking, however I feel that the fact that this direction could not be altered to make a home for the character of Daniel Jackson, the man who opened the Stargate and has been there from the beginning is incredibly disappointing.
Daniel Jackson has created a place on the team that cannot be filled by any other character and I find it amazing that TPTB can have underestimated him so much and cannot see that you cannot replace what is irreplaceable.
Recent episodes of Season Five are only confirming that the writers seem to find Daniel to be expendable and are blatantly ignoring the team dynamic that has made Stargate what it is. If the show continues along these lines I will not be tuning in for Season 6; I would rather remember episodes as they were back when TPTB recognised that ALL members of SG-1 make up SG-1, lose one and there is not point in watching.Jenni <cloudsurfing42@icqmail.com>
England - Friday, January 4, 2002, 6:07 PM
Obviously, you, The Powers That Be, have underestimated the importance of the Daniel Jackson character in the equation of the SG1 team. Michael Shanks has made it clear he is leaving because he was not wanted. This is amazing. He is a COMPLETELY integral part of the show as is his character in the SG1 team. Why have Shanks and Judge been underused? Judge, as Teal’c, is an EXTREMELY important partof the team because of his knowledge of the enemy. Shanks, as Jackson, is JUST as important. Have YOU ever learned to read heiroglyphs? I had -- long before this show -- and so it has always intrigued me to watch Daniel Jackson read and translate. Sure, he’s not a military guy, but playing the archaeologist, linguist, etc., he has established his importance on the team. Dean, as O’Neill has made it clear that his character would barrel in and all would be over without the beneficial knowledge of Teal’c and ESPECIALLY Daniel Jackson who decodes, translates and thinks things over. Jackson, as the quiet hero, is the antithesis of O’Neill’s military attitude, more or less of, "Kill ’em all - let God sort ’em out." And why focus on the "romance" between O’Neill and Carter when your own technical assistant from the Air Force says nothing like that would EVER be allowed. Sure, it’s fun for you to allude to it and for them to look at each other with longing eyes, but if you’re not going to allow it, why "torture" the characters. Besides all of that, all four characters of the SG1 team have bonded and deserve to be together -- including Daniel Jackson (a.k.a. Michael Shanks.
In case you haven’t been paying attention, The X Files is circling the drain because Chris Carter made a similar mistake in Season 7 -- making it clear that he felt David Duchovny was not essential to the show. So they had Fox Mulder abducted, tortured and returned in a really bizarre manner which was never completely explained. Duchovny, of his own free will, did not return for S9 in order to go on with his film career. I can live with that. However, look at the ratings. Not only is X Files circling the drain, soeone’s going to put a stopper in it once it’s gone and it will be remembered as a brilliant, break-out show that tanked in the end.
Shanks has made it clear he does NOT want to leave. The fans have made it clear THEY don’t want him to leave.
SO WHY IS MICHAEL SHANKS LEAVING?
You’re going to learn the hard way, just as Chris Carter has with X Files, what a horrible mistake you’re making. I, for one, will not watch the show without Shanks.
I hope you rethink your decisions.Laura Virgil <LRVIRTUAL@AOL.COM>
Mesquite, Texas, USA - Friday, January 4, 2002, 4:56 PM
Just wanted to ask one question: Why do you focus so much on Sam and Jack? Aren't there other things to show? What about for example Janet? She is introduced, wo get to see that she is Sam's best friend, but we know nothing about her background or past. Or Teal'c. He's really a great character and deserves that his character is explored much more in the show.
Rebecca <EilanofAlbion@gmx.net>
Duisburg , Germany - Thursday, January 3, 2002, 5:23 AM
I singularly fail to understand why 'The Powers That Be' and the writers of Stargate SG-1 are unable to fully utilise four well rounded characters and their interpersonal relationships which were formed over five series of the show in favour of going for the cheap and oh so (ch)easy solution of a new character. Do you honestly assume Stargate is only watched by complete morons without a braincell between them? As Mr Anderson has already said in the 'Hollywood Reporter' "Bottom line: If you're not telling good stories, people are going to tune out, and they'll see right through the sham." The fans of the series, you know, those people who actaully watch the show, are looking and not liking what they are seeing. What's the matter writers, originality and creative thought too difficult for you these days? It wasn't once. Please don't ruin what has been a most emjoyable show by going down the road of so many other series and turning Stargate into just another gung-ho American conspiracy camp. It would be a most ignominious ending for what began and continued as most excellant entertainment.Sioux <Sioux_s@hotmail.com>
Thursday, January 3, 2002, 9:52 PM
SG-1 is about a stargate that takes the cast and viewers to other worlds. The reason I watch it is to get away from this sick planet we live on. So what makes you think that people outside the USA are interested in the workings of your secret military services (NID). I don't even know what NID stands for.
Nikki <nblair56@yahoo.co.uk>
Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK - Tuesday, January 1, 2002, 5:30 PM
I just wondered when did Daniel become merely a comrade in arms rather than a friend? I watched Stargate from S1,episode 1 and enjoyed the idea that these 4 disparate people grew into a closely bonded group. Why did that change? When did the show become concentrated on super Sam and Stupid Jack? Why did Daniel and Teal'c become wallpaper? Why suddenly have we annoying new characters when the characters who are meant to be the stars have less and less to do? Why has a lot of the stories become earthbound and are more about politics then SF?
Rach <rachie114@yahoo.co.uk>
Leeds, UK - Tuesday, January 1, 2002, 5:45 AM
Just curious, but why couldn't the screen time and story focus you are now going to have to dedicate to introducing us to a new civilian character have been given over to properly utilising the already establihsed, immensely popular and quite irreplaceable and indispensible civlian member of the team who by your own admission carried the moral focus of the show and provided an opposing point of view and who you are now going to have to 'struggle' to replace - that you already had?
Phoenix Emrys <phoenix@prairie.ca>
Winnipeg, MB, Canada - Monday, December 31, 2001, 7:09 PM
What little does it profit a show if it gains a more desireable demographic and loses market share?
Sage
USA - Sunday, December 30, 2001, 11:26 PM
Why was Daniel missing from the season 3 tapes spine picture but it had the others and Seth and his followers and Thor? Why didn't Daniel have his own page IN the official calendar but everyone ELSE did ? Why was Daniel missing FROM the publicity pics at Showtime at the beginning OF the season? Why has Daniel been turned INTO wallpaper, a background character who IN SOME epis has less TO do AND say than the guests ? Why does Sam get so much focus, most OF it silly doomed boyfriend OF the week OR Super Sam stuff ? Why didn 't you do more to keep Michael Shanks challenged as an actor and give his character something to do instead of making his character unnecessary? Why has there been so much of Sam and Jack on the DVD covers? What about covers with the whole team or don't the other two COUNT because they 're just there to be scenery? Why is Teal'c still wallpaper, Daniel turned INTO wallpaper AND the series has turned INTO a poor imitation OF X Files ? Why do other characters LIKE Martin AND Cadet Elliot get storylines WHEN Daniel IS given nothing TO do? Why wasn't SG1 given the focus in Wormhole Extreme with cameos by the crew to celebrate 100 epis instead of turning it into the Jack and Martin show? Why are you determined to change the series into something it isn't ? Are you trying TO get a new audience AND don't care about the fans who supported you for years when the magazines were trashing the series? Why are you trying to kid people that Michael Shanks left to "pursue other projects" when the truth is you gave him nothing to do and turned his character into wallpaper? Do you think the fans are stupid and won't notice WHEN you do this? Do you think we won 't notice that Jack and Daniel are not having scenes like they did in Need and Serpent's Lair, that Sam AND Teal'c are being kept apart for reasons unknown and that there are more and more episode set on Earth?Sharon B
USA - Sunday, December 30, 2001, 11:47 AM
I have always loved Stargate, firstly the movie and then the series. I enjoyed the new characters you introduced and loved the whole team together. What happened this series? It started off so well, then I started to wait for meaningful stories not only for Daniel but also Teal'c. I am so tired of Jack + Guest, Sam + Guest or saving world. I don't like conspiricy stories, never did I can watch several other series and get that. Bring back Daniel and start going through the Gate again, I will watch S6 then, the rest without the character of Daniel Jackson holds on interest for me.
Linda
UK - Thursday, January 3, 2002, 9:35 PM
To whom it may concern,
I watched Daniel dying last night, something revealed to me by SKY1 before the programme by the announcer flippantly announcing this was the episode Daniel "copped it". I did not know it was going to happen. I am still in shock and I still burst into tears when I think about what has been done to someone I’ve become very fond of since I saw him and O’Neill in the Stargate film. I am not in any clubs or anything but I do have access to the Internet so I did a search to see if Michael Shanks was coming back and I found this website. I have it bookmarked now. I agree with many of the people here and it was good to see I was not the only person so upset about this. What has been done to Daniel and to the actor playing him is a terrible thing. I have watched as the team friendships have had a pointless game of mix and match played with them, with people who have no sexual interest in each other trying to act like they have in a way that made me curl up with embarrassment, people split up, in Daniel’s case last year split up from everyone else and Jack and Teal’c suddenly being shown as the programme’s main friendship and Daniel left out in the cold. Now this. I wish I had stopped watching last year so I would not have had to see this episode. I hope Michael Shanks goes on to do great things as i am sure he will because he is a great actor. Whoever gave the order to stop using the Daniel character and to stop the hugs and the friendship between Daniel and Jack should be fired. This was a stupid decision and as far as I am concerned it has dealt the final death blow to Stargate SG-1. Now it will continue with Major Carter as its leading character until everyone gets fed up with it and stops watching.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Woods (former viewer)Ms Rebecca Woods <private>
Coventry, ENG. - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 6:24 AM
A little memory jogger for TPTB - in ’1969’ ep #221, Cassandra of the future states "Why Daniel, I hardly recognised you without hair" This tells us two things 1) he’s on Earth in the future, 2) he’s aged. This means he’s got to come back in a state of being that means he can age....Orlin told us it was possible in Ascension - now do it!Another point - don’t know if TPTB ever read fanfic - if they did they would realise what’s important - the FRIENDSHIP and TEAM SPIRIT between all the members of SG-1, but in particular Jack and Daniel. They are polar opposites who achieve the same goal by very different means, and respect each other for what they individually lack.
Saw Meridian last night, and again this morning - a fitting moving on for Daniel BUT Jonas - come on guys - if Jack remotely likes him after two eps you’ll not only have completely lost the plot (you’re halfway there already), you’ll need a few of good old Dr McKenzie’s remedies!
athene <goddess.athene@ntlworld.com>
Warrington, UK - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 5:14 AM
So, now we all know what to do if we are ever in danger of being exposed to a leathal dose of radiation. Just stand ten feet away, we’ll be fine, well it worked for Jonas!PLEASE.!!!!!We are not stupid you know. Well I dont think it matters now anyway the show is over.Brady <glynnjon@hotmail.com>
Cork, Ireland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 4:58 AM
It isn’t even about "can’t believe it has happened" - even tho’, morning after THAT episode, I am still in shock!
The Stargate film would not have been without the Daniel Jackson character - the Stargate series certainly is NOT without the Daniel Jackson character!
Daniel Jackson and Jack O’Neill - Jack O’Neill and Daniel Jackson - that is what Stargate has always been about - so how can anyone think that season six is going to work if the main & central pairing is over!
This is just plain nutsSandy Lerman <sandy.mike@stopathome.fsnet.co.uk>
London, UK - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 4:49 AM
Hi Hank,Michale Shanks is a talented actor. The part of Daniel Jackson is well-written and Shanks portrays him well.
The public want to see the character return and Shanks has expressed his interest in continuing.
Let’s face it, a spinoff movie probably won’t make it
without the Jakcson character. Why ignore that revenue?
How much more convincing does this argument have to be?
Regards,
Dermott Bolger
Dermott Bolger <dermott.bolger@dublin.com>
Dublin, Ireland - Thursday, January 31, 2002, 4:26 AM
I’m so ANGRY right now!!! The Idiots In Charge have outdone themselves THIS time! They ruined the team, they ruined the friendships, they split up Daniel and Jack for some STUPID attempt at romance with Sam and her boss (Yes sir, no sir, would you like a snog and a sneaky look at my boobs with that naquada bomb sir!). Now they’ve killed Daniel who started it all but first they downplayed his importance in the series and made him into a bit part! These people shouldn’t be in charge of writing a shopping list never mind episodes for a television series! Daniel is better off away from these clueless cackhanded clowns. Now they can carry on stealing ideas from movies and have all the shooting and X-files storylines they want. I’d ask why but they’d only talk out the sides of their mouths anyway or twist the question round so what’s the bleeding point!K. Marsh
England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 8:14 PM
So, what did Michael Shanks do that pissed you guys off? He must have done or said something because I can’t imagine any other reason why seemingly intelligent people would marginalize their most popular character like this. And even that would be a stupid reason to push such an important character into the background in favor of a romance between two characters who have next to no chemistry. Were you surprised to find the show had so many female viewers? Did you think that because we are women, we’d want a romance? News Flash: The majority of women who watch your show are far more interested in the friendship between Jack and Daniel than they are in seeing Jack and Sam jump between the sheets. You blew it, big time. Maybe this will be a lesson to future TPTBs, but I doubt it. Rosalita <imrosalita@cox.net>
USA - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 7:26 PM
Dear PTB,
I just would like to know "why". Why are you doing this? Why are you demoting a character that started this adventure, who was the main character in the movie, and has the largest fan base? Why are you singling out/ignoring fans? Why are you changing the entire format of what once was such a unique and winning show? The main goal of season six was to gain more viewers. How is that going to happen when all the long-time fans are being treated like garbage? Why would the Danielites/MSOOFers, the largest fan base the show has, watch, when they have no reason to watch and they are being stabbed in the back? Michael Shanks wasn’t even out the door yet, and his "replacement" was introduced. Why do you have time for the new guy, but not the guy that started it all? I support, understand, and applaud Michael Shanks’ decision. I don’t envy his position. Being responsible for this character, his development, and literally becoming this character only to be told, he isn’t worthy of an upgrade. Hall <earlyprimaryteacher@yahoo.com>
Chicago, IL - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 6:17 PM
Ok Guys - I have just left a message for Mr Cohen and I urge you all to do it too. Its worth the price of a phone call to this gentleman to let him know that we are angry! The more calls we make, the bigger the impact!Elizabeth (alias wookie@ukgateway.net)
Elizabeth Wylie <wookie@ukgateway.net>
London, United Kingdom - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 6:04 PM
When Stargage SG1 is good, it’s great. It can be a very powerful show, because it has excellent characters played by first rate actors, and the audience CARES about them. The recent Season 5 episodes Menace and now Meridian show how good it can be. But without Daniel, how good can it be? He’s the heart center of the group. Wow, what an actor Micheal Shanks is. And the other characters consider DANIEL to be their closest friend on the team. He’s the one that spurs them on to be better people, to learn and to grow. I can’t imaging Stargate without him. I’m still in shock from seeing him written out in Meridian. There’s an opening left in the story to bring him back. Please bring him back! Please!Julia
Julia <Joolz4me@hotmail.com>
Isle of Erraid , Scotland - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:48 PM
Ok, Now we all know that MS has chosen his own path,
and may he have the best of wishes in everything he does!!
but to be honest, the way he was written out was crap and unfeeling!!
I was kinda tearfull at his loss, but please!!
I know there is not going to be a return and am abit miffed at the scriptwriters woosey way out!
So, therefore if there was a way for daniel to make an appearance, I would love for it to happen. but I know otherwise.
shaks
london, England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:33 PM
Micheal left because he wasn’t being given enough scenes....military scenes were dominating! Stargate is about travelling to other worlds! Why are you guys focusing on conspiracy? You now know what you should be focusing on! BRINGING DANIEL BACK! DO IT! NOW! And if Mr. Shanks is reading this...We are all behind you. We understand why you had to leave. And if the rest of the actors from SG-1 are reading this then help to try and bring Micheal back! Micheal Shanks amounst the rest of the crew made stargate sg-1 what it is.....with just one of them missing from the team it just isn’t sg-1! And I thnk the rest of the watchers of the series will agree with me there.
Andy
Reading, UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:31 PM
How long will it be before the writers realise what a huge mistake they have made? I was upset before watching Meridian - now I’m upset and angry. Everyone can see the impact Michael Shanks has on the screen - everyone except TPTB.You cannot replace him so don’t even try!Maybe when the next series is a massive flop you may realise what you let slip away.You may ignore all the fans pleas now but we can and will protest with our remote controls "off" button.If you had any sense whatsoever you would be begging Michael to return for season 6.Cally <CalK31aol.com>
Merseyside, England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 5:23 PM
are you trying to give me a heart attack??
just watched meridian and am in floods of tears. great performances all round, except for jonas, he didn’t need to be there and that wasn’t a good way to introduce him. I now immediately dislike him and won’t be sticking around to see if he is half decent.
no one can replace daniel.i’m going off for a cry. it’s too early to even vent properly
linsey <linsey_kree@hotmail.com>
perth, scotland - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:55 PM
Well I just can’t believe what I have just witnessed! How can they write Daniel Jackson out of the show? Who will translate the writings they find and fill everyone else in on the history? Who will Jack get frustrated with? I am upset and angry!!! Please bring him back!Dawn <dawn@btinternet .com>
Burnley, Lancs - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:46 PM
What is it with the producers? Are they insane? I have just watched the Meridian episode on Sky One and I am in a state of shock. I had no warning of the demise of Daniel. Stargate has to be one of the best series on television for a long time and it works because of the ’team’, the characters of which compliment each other and have made Stargate such a success. Each character contributes his own traits to the whole experience and success of the show. Although characters have been ’modified’, (the most significant change having taken place with Jack), during each series and not always with positive effect, removing a character completely destroys what to me has been such a successful formula. I think the producers have got it completely wrong. Vince Stonebank <stonebank@skynow.net>
England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:39 PM
Why destroy the best part of SG1? I’ve just watched Meridian, which surprised me by showing each of the members of SG1 caring that Daniel was dying. Why is this a surprise? Because the rest of the season would have indicated that noone gave a damn about Daniel. Ironic that his last episode has to remind us that when written well, SG1 and Daniel are indispensible to one another. I won’t be watching any more, unless you come to your senses and get him back.Nikki Camilleri <Nikki@camilleris.co.uk>
Teddington, Middx/UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:25 PM
Post-Meridan tears are starting to turn to anger. Are we supposed to accept Jonas as a member of the team after that? Daniel willingly walking away from everything he’d believed in and loved for five years, from the only family he ever had? Too upset to put these feelings into words. The knowledge that had you all just let Daniel have his place on the team - the place that is rightfully his - we wouldn’t have had to go through this. Wouldn’t be sitting here with tissues and a bottle of Jack Daniels. As for season 6 - after that, I can’t watch. I will simply wait. And when Daniel returns to claim the place on SG1 that’s rightfully his, I’ll watch again.elfin <elfin@burble.com>
UK - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:23 PM
I just watched the "Daniel Jackson walks off into the sunset" episode. I had no idea it was coming and I immediately came online to find out what the hell was going on. Didn’t take me long to find this site. I’ll be very frank, no Daniel Jackson, no longer interested in watching the show. I like the character of Jack O’Neill but my main interest in him is as part of a duo, Jack and Daniel. Without Daniel, what’s the point? It would work the other way too, I wouldn’t watch without Jack. I watch for their interaction, they are without a doubt the only really interesting characters on the show and each works perectly as foil for the other. Until Daniel returns, my interest in Stargate is over.Marysia <marysia@marysia.com>
Ayrshire, Scotland - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 4:09 PM
To TPTB: What is it with you people? I live in a country where from one minute to the next you never know if a bullet has your name on it and I watch SG-1 to escape that! Daniel Jackson was me when, in the movie, he made that small step into the event horizon of the wormhole and stopped. That wonder, that fascination with the possibility of unlimited planets to explore and people to meet was a part of me from the minute I realised where the movie was heading and what it was about. I looked forward each week to what adventures my favourite planet-hopping team would slide into but now I won’t be watching SG-1 episodes that don’t have my favourite scientiest in it. That’s just an unhappy reminder that you people (Americans) don’t know when you have a good thing until it’s gone.kiagirl <lawrencekerry@hotmail.com>
Kingston, Jamaica - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 2:35 PM
Why do the the writers think that anyone who has watched the last five seasons will stick around for another?You insult us with weak storylines,you make the actors behave completely the opposite to the way they have behaved in the past and then you decide that we don’t really need Michael Shanks as part of the team anymore.We are not all brainwashed morons who will accept whteve you throw at us because the title of the programme remains the same.I do not want to watch the new cast ensemble of Jack the ignorant clown,Super Sam saviour of the world and Teal’c the token alien together with "new guy" Jonas.I can just picture the writing meetings - "don’t worry guys the fans wil accept him.They will have forgotten Daniel and the integral role he played withn a few weeks"
Well this fan won’t forget and she won’t be interested in how good or bad Corin Nemec turns out to be.Along with many other fans I won’t be watching anymore.I’ve got four seasons of videos so that I can remember when SG1 was the best series around not the third rate badly written excuse for a show that it has become.I will really miss watching you Michael - but I won’t miss watching the dross that has become Stargate SG1. Cally <CalK31@aol.com>
Merseysid, England - Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 9:27 AM
Why??
The character of Dr. Daniel Jackson is such an integral part of Stargate SG1 that it is inconceivable that the producers believe that the series last season will be a success without his presence. Michael Shanks is very fine actor who has made us believe in Daniel Jackson. He has given a balance to a show that could have very easily fallen into the trap of becoming another action adventure show with bits of sci-fi thrown in on occasion. We care about these people because they represent humanity in all of its diverse components.
In this new age of uncertainity that our real life has forced upon us, we want to believe that good can triumph over evil, that compassion and knowledge are ultimately stronger than the most terrifying of weapons.
While I in no way wish to demean the contributions or talents of the other actors, without Michael Shanks on Stargate SG1, I doubt that I will watch this last season. The interactions, both verbal and physical, between the lead actors, in particular Richard Dean Anderson and Michael Shanks has always been a source of great enjoyment to me. I will miss that, as no doubt will many others.
Please, try to resolve the issues with Michael Shanks.
It has been demonstrated time and again, that there is a wonderfully creative workforce behind the production of this series. Please use that energy and ingenuity to find a way to include this talented and beloved actor in this farewell to a series that he has already made such a large contribution to. Carol L Jacobs <iolecat@lycos.com>
New Jersey USA - Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 11:57 PM
When they come to take you away ,please make sure they get Mullie and Mollozzi first.zootek
Galway, Ireland - Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 3:06 PM
Just a quick question? Would you like me to send you some clean underwear? if you have been reading any of the things being said about Michael leaving the show you are going to need some.Claire
Cardif, U.K. - Monday, January 28, 2002, 5:19 AM
Why did you do it? Why let someone like Michael Shanks slip through your fingers? Do you think we will keep on watching? You are in for a BIG fall.You hear that? thats us hitting the off switch.Jilly <jh007b8111>
Bristol, England - Friday, January 25, 2002, 5:16 PM
PTB: Just a few questions regarding the supposed story line of Meridian: 1. Do you expect us to believe that Dr. Daniel Jackson is dying and his teammates do nothing beyond the ordinary to try to save his life? No contact of alien races, no search for a cure across the galaxy, no trying to find a sarcophagus? 2. Jack O’Neill, the man ready to retire when he thinks Daniel’s dead in Fire and Water simply accepts Daniel’s "death" with little or no emotion? In my life, my friendships have usually gotten deeper the longer I’ve known someone, seems to me like your writers believe that deep friendships get shallower over the years.babs
babs <baeckknit@aol.com>
Hershey, PA - Wednesday, January 23, 2002, 9:16 PM
I’ve got a question. Being as that MGM is now up for sale, how does this
fact bare on the SG-SG1 proposed second movie and the new SG series Atlantis?
Will whoever buys MGM agree to the second movie and the new series or not? I would
love to know from TPTB if they have heard anything in regards
to this area.Thanks
MaryAW
MaryAW <MWhit1028@aol.com>
Springfield, MO, USA - Sunday, January 20, 2002, 2:55 PM
Whatever happened to the *wonder*?Daniel Jackson stepped through the Stargate in search of "meaning of life stuff" (season 1, "Torment of Tantalus"), and I am deeply appreciative for the *wonder* I’ve been able to experience alongside him on the journey. After all, isn’t that something we’re all seeking, and always questioning? If you take that away, all you have left is formula television, more "same old, same old". Earth-bound controversies, shadow governments, aliens secretly living among us… Sorry, but these are not new concepts. I’d go even further to say they’re stale and over-done. If I want to see these kind of stories, I’ll watch X-Files, Earth: Final Conflict, First Wave, or a number of other shows, both living and extinct. Stargate SG-1 was different. It was fresh and creative, with characters I could believe in, who were seen to possess three, full dimensions rather than being traditional television cardboard cut-outs. Every episode stirred my imagination. Every character had value. The team interaction was outstanding, with each person adding a unique link in a beautifully woven chain. These aspects blended together in a way I’d not seen on television before. Only the best programs have that ever-illusive thing called "chemistry", and Stargate SG-1 was the best of the best.
As I’m sure you realize, even the most phenomenal concepts can fizzle into nothing if they’re produced without that little bit of unexplainable and rarely attainable magic that weaves everything - from actors, to characters, to scripts - together so tightly it can seem they’ve always *belonged*. They *fit* so cleanly, so cohesively you risk everything by taking even one element away. Yet Stargate SG-1’s special chemistry has been poisoned, first with stale story-lines, and now with the loss of SG-1’s heart, the character of Daniel Jackson. I hope you can find the antidote before it’s too late, before this franchise dies an early death.
I was thrilled to learn we’d get one, final season of what had been the finest show on television; yet now my excitement seems to have been misplaced. I urge you to bring back the *wonder*, the spirit that was Stargate SG-1. Let us step through that Gate across the galaxies as much as possible before it’s finally buried for good. Don’t chain us to the Earth. Let us journey through the stars….
And let us make that journey with the character who made it all possible, Dr. Daniel Jackson, as portrayed by the talented Michael Shanks.
I fear that the wonder I’d finally found after 40 years of flipping channels is being swept under the rug. Stargate SG-1 has been diverted from a universe filled with "what-if’s" and unceremoniously deposited into the corporate realm of dollars-and-cents, where all that matters is demographics - a word with little real value in the end. If demographics’ studies were perfect, there would be no failed shows on television - every one would be a winner. Yet aren’t the majority of new programs introduced in a given year actually cancelled and quickly forgotten?
Stargate SG-1 developed its own niche in a vast and competitive industry. A dedicated audience was established. Why risk losing that niche and losing that audience with only one season left to go? I understand you hope to establish a new audience for a spin-off series; but why alienate your first audience in the process? A new series will be a *new* series - we can understand and accept that fact, and hopefully we’ll be able to review it based on its own merits. But Stargate SG-1 was built on wonder, without which "…the rest is silence" (my apologies to Mr. Shakespeare).
Debra <dkraft@yazaki-na.com>
Detroit, MI/USA - Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 10:21 AM
The one question I’d like to ask TPTB: Did you at least get a group rate on the lobotomies?eos <akmeade@earthlink.net>
Iowa - Saturday, January 12, 2002, 10:23 PM
Why did you get rid of Anise?I thought the character of Anise had great potential for future storylines. She was everything that Jack hated about the Tok’ra and I thought there could have been some great conflict between the two.
Other than that I have been very satisfied with SG1 and look forward to the rest of the series.
Jean <jmc3@hotmail.com>
Brisbane, Qld, Australia - Saturday, January 12, 2002, 4:49 AM
I’m wondering about the merchandise that has been made available for Stargate over the last few years. It has been very minimal and, frankly, disappointing. Here in the US, we can’t even get past 1st season on DVD (and I don’t believe the series is available at all on VHS?). There have only been a few novels and I understand there won’t be anymore (other than those based on the movie universe, which has gone in a different direction). There has been a book published about the series... but only in the UK. There have up through Season 4 DVDs available overseas in regions other than Region 1 (the USA). There is an official calendar... again only available in the UK. And speaking of that official calendar... uh, where the heck was Michael Shanks (Daniel Jackson) in the calendar? Other than appearing in a few "team" shots, there wasn’t a single page dedicated to his character! This is a guy who has been on the show for five years, he’s the 2nd lead, and arguably one of the fans’ favorite character! The calendar itself is nice, but I was overall very disappointed after going to all of the trouble of having to import the product (sight unseen) and then finding out that 1/4 of the team I was interested in wasn’t even featured in the calendar! For Pete’s sake, Bra’tac, a GUEST STAR had a page he featured on with Teal’c! So, I guess my question is: why isn’t SG1 being marketed to the US fans? and why is one of the fans’ favorite characters being ignored in the products that *do* exist?Ann Wortham <ashton7@aol.com>
Orlando, FL - Tuesday, January 8, 2002, 1:55 PM
I'd like to know why we can't have more episodes like The Nox (still my favorite) and Fire and Water. Different planets, aliens respectfully and fascinatingly portrayed, team solidarity, action, considerable angst. Conspiracy theories and forbidden love, blech.
Jill <grundfest@midyork.lib.ny.us>
Richfield Springs, Noo Yawk - Thursday, December 27, 2001, 3:35 PM
Hi! I'm a 25 year old male. I want you to bring Anise back. I want you to bring her back and kill her horribly! Land a pyramid ship on her! Have a death glider mow her down! Feed her to the replicator bugs! Make her listen to the Tollan until she shoots herself! I'd say give her to Janet to kill, but that would just be too mean. Signed, Dionysus, Charter Member, Society for the Gruesome Death of Anise
Dionysus <dionysus@mindspring.com>
Atlanta, GA - Tuesday, December 25, 2001, 12:00 AM
Dudes! If you were going to kill someone, why'd it have to be Rothman instead of Anise? I really liked Rothman! Xochiquetzl
Etlanna, Jawjah - Monday, December 24, 2001, 11:40 PM
Stargate SG-1 and its characters are the property of Stargate (II) Productions, SCI FI Channel, Showtime/Viacom, MGM/UA, Double Secret Productions, and Gekko Productions. All blog entries represent the opinion of the poster. All editorials represent the opinion of the author. All linked content represents the opinion of the linked site's webmaster. Copyright on all articles/editorials/blog entries belongs to the original author. Offer void where prohibited. Please remain seated while the aircraft is in motion. Warning: Coffee will be hot. A moose once bit my sister.
